Table 2.
In vitro micronucleus results after Lacprodan® BLG exposure.
| Exposure | Concentration (μg/mL) | CBPI slide 1 / slide 2 | Relative cell growth (%)a | Micronucleated cells (%) culture 1 /culture 2 | Average number of micronucleated cells (%) | Historical negative control limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment I (– S9) | 0.29 % - 1.16 % | |||||
| 0 | 1.51 / 1.40 | 100 | 0.20 / 0.30 | 0.25 | ||
| 1000 | 1.36 / 1.38 | 81 | 0.70 / 0.30 | 0.50 | ||
| 1500 | 1.48 / 1.58 | 116 | 1.10 / 0.40 | 0.75* | ||
| 2000 | 1.44 / 1.50 | 102 | 0.40 / 0.40 | 0.40 | ||
| Positive controls | ||||||
| MMS | 65 | 1.38 / 1.38 | 83 | 4.90 / 1.75 | 3.33* | |
| Colchicine | 0.8 | 1.19 / 1.15 | 37 | 3.60 / 5.80 | 4.70* | |
| Experiment I (+S9) | 0.28 % - 1.26 % | |||||
| 0 | 1.46 / 1.47 | 100 | 0.90 / 0.40 | 0.65 | ||
| 500 | 1.44 / 1.48 | 100 | 0.50 / 0.80 | 0.65 | ||
| 1000 | 1.45 / 1.44 | 96 | 0.70 / 0.70 | 0.70 | ||
| 1500 | 1.44 / 1.42 | 93 | 1.00 / 0.40 | 0.70 | ||
| 2000 | 1.40 / 1.59 | 108 | 0.60 / 1.00 | 0.80 | ||
| Positive control | ||||||
| CPA | 15 | 1.28 / 1.28 | 60 | 2.30 / 3.70 | 3.00* | |
| Experiment II (– S9) | 0.29 % - 1.16 % | |||||
| 0 | 1.60 / 1.71 | 100 | 0.90 / 0.70 | 0.80 | ||
| 1000 | 1.60 / 1.62 | 93 | 1.30 / 0.30 | 0.80 | ||
| 1500 | 1.65 / 1.60 | 96 | 1.00 / 0.90 | 0.95 | ||
| 2000 | 1.72 / 1.58 | 99 | 0.60 / 1.20 | 0.90 | ||
| Positive controls | ||||||
| MMS | 50 | 1.44 / 1.61 | 80 | 3.70 / 5.10 | 4.40* | |
| Colchicine | 0.04 | 1.23 / 1.22 | 34 | 4.60 / 6.49 | 5.55* |
CBPI = ((c1 x 1) + (c2 x 2) + (cx x 3)) / n, where c1, c2 and cx are mononucleate, binucleate and multinucleate cells, respectively, and n = total number of cells.
Relative cell growth = 100 x ((CBPItest conc. – 1) / (CBPIcontrol – 1)).
P < 0.05 as compared with control (Chi-square test). MMS = methylmethanesulfonate; CPA = cyclophosphamide.
Relative to negative control.