. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Assessment. 2019 Aug 20;28(3):964–976. doi: 10.1177/1073191119869823

Table 3.

Model Fit Statistics for CFA Invariance Tests Across Sex Full Sample of US college students (n=1,311).

Model	χ²DIFF (DF)	CFI	ΔCFI	RMSEA	95% CI
All Items
Equal Forms	--------------	.940	------	.041	.040, .042
Full Invariance	577.120 (351)^*	.953	−.013	.035	.034, .036
Partial Invariance	452.290 (313)^*	.954	−.014	.035	.034, .036
Reduced BDEFS
Equal Forms	--------------	.959	------	.046	.045, .048
Full Invariance	216.710 (186)	.969	−.010	.039	.037, .040

Note.

p<.001.

χ2DIFF= Chi-Square Test for Difference Testing for WLSMV estimation, CFI=Comparative Fit Index, ΔCFI=change in CFI, RMSEA= Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, 95% CI= 95% confidence interval for RMSEA. For all model evaluations, full invariance and partial invariance models compared to equal forms models based on chi-square DIFFTEST for WLSMV estimation and the change in CFI.