Skip to main content
editorial
. 2021 Mar 31;20:75. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01254-1

Table 4.

Heart failure outcome trials completed in 2020: comparison of active vs. placebo group

EMPEROR-reduced [30] SOLOIST-WHF [31
Class & Cardiovascular outcomes HR (95.6% CI) p-value Class & Cardiovascular outcomes HR (95.6% CI) p-value

Primary composite outcome

Composite of CV death or hospitalisation for HF

0.75 (0.65–0.86)

p < 0.001

Primary composite outcome

Total occurrences of CV death, HHF, and urgent visits for HF

0.67 (0.52–0.85)

p < 0.001

Secondary outcome

Total no. of hospitalisations for HF

0.70 (0.58–0.85)

p < 0.001

Secondary outcome

Total occurrence of HF events

0.64 (0.49–0.83)

p < 0.001

Secondary outcome

Mean slope of change in eGFR — ml/min/1.73 m2 per year

1.73 (1.10–2.37)

p < 0.001

Secondary outcome

CV death

0.84 (0.58–1.22)

p = 0.36

Other prespecified analyses

Composite kidney outcome

0.50 (0.32–0.77)

Secondary outcome

3P-Mace and HHF events

0.72 (0.56–0.92)

Other prespecified analyses

No. of hospitalisation for any cause

0.85 (0.75–0.95)

Secondary outcome

All-cause mortality

0.82 (0.59–1.14)

Other prespecified analyses

All-cause death

0.92 (0.77–1.10)
Adverse events Event rate (%) active vs. placebo group Adverse events Event rate (%) active vs. placebo group
Worsening renal function 3.2 vs. 5.1 Diarrhea 6.1 vs. 3.4
Genital tract infections 1.7 vs. 0.6 Severe hypoglycaemia 1.5 vs. 0.3
Hypotension 9.4 vs. 8.7 Hypotension 6.0 vs. 4.6