Table 2.
Correlation of CSE expression with clinicopathological characteristics in the discovery cohort-NDMCi.
| CSE expression |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| High RIa |
Low RIa |
P valueb | |
| N = 18 | N = 117 | ||
| Age | |||
| 56< | 9 | 66 | 0.61 |
| 55≥ | 9 | 51 | |
| FIGO stagec | |||
| III | 15 | 85 | 0.402 |
| IV | 3 | 32 | |
| Histological typed | |||
| Serous | 1 | 86 | <0.0001 |
| Clear cell | 14 | 11 | |
| Endometrioid | 1 | 9 | |
| Mucinous | 2 | 11 | |
| Histological gradee | |||
| 1 or 2 | 3 | 37 | 0.1957 |
| 3 | 15 | 80 | |
| Response to chemotherapyf | |||
| Responders (CR/PRg) | 1 | 42 | <0.0001 |
| Non-responders (SD/PDh) | 10 | 22 | |
Reactive intensity scores of automated quantitative virtual immunofluorescence pathology (AQVIP).
Calculated by Chi-squared or Fisher exact test.
According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
According to Silverberg grading.
According to the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines (version 1.1).
Complete response/partial response.
Stable disease/progression disease.
Four patients, whose tissue cores which were designed on tissue microarray were worn after deep sectioning, were excluded from the analysis.