Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;22:95. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02282-6

Table 4.

Comparison of the numbers of errors in coding and non-coding regions before and after running Homopolish using the Zymo R9.4 dataset

Coding regions errors Non-coding regions errors
Before After Correction ratio Before After Correction ratio
B. subtilis 446 80 82.06% 232 165 28.88%
E. faecalis 244 21 91.39% 176 34 80.68%
S. aureus 306 38 87.58% 100 17 83.00%
L. monocytogenes 160 19 88.13% 80 26 67.50%
P. aeruginosa 666 30 95.50% 279 8 97.13%
S. enterica 469 66 85.93% 118 13 88.98%
E. coli 544 163 70.04% 201 141 29.85%

DFAST was used for the annotation of coding/non-coding regions in each genome