Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;5(2):e10580. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10580

Table 2.

Program responses

Question N Percentage
Has your program ever presented didactic lectures focused on LGBTQ+ health issues?
Yes 85 75.2
No 28 24.8
Has your program incorporated LGBTQ+ health concerns into general lecture topics where LGBTQ+ patients are disproportionately affected?
Yes 62 54.9
No 51 45.1
How many hours of didactic lectures on LGBTQ+ health issues did your program present in 2019? Median (IQR) = 2 (1–3) h; range = 0–22 h
How many didactic hours per year should be devoted to LGBTQ+ health issues? Median (IQR) = 4 (2–5) h; range = 0–20 h
Has your program ever conducted a journal club or other nondidactic activity related to LGBTQ+ health issues?
Yes 29 25.7
No 84 74.3
Barriers you have encountered to integrating LGBTQ+ topics into your curriculum and patient care
Lack of interested faculty 24 21.2
Lack of funding 9 8.0
Lack of time 71 62.8
Perception education is not needed 17 15.0
Opposition to inclusion of LGBTQ+ health topics 2 1.8
No barriers 30 26.5
Other 14 12.4

Abbreviation: LGBTQ+, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning.