Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;24(13):4113–4123. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002803

Table 2.

Association between pregestational BMI and patterns of postpartum weight change

Reference group: return to pregestational weight PPWR PPWG PPWR + WG
Pregestational BMI* n RRR 95 % CI P-value RRR 95 % CI P-value RRR 95 % CI P-value
Model 1
 Normal weight 205 Reference Reference Reference
 Overweight 203 0·77 0·37, 1·61 0·491 2·53 1·33, 4·81 0·005 1·26 0·76, 2·09 0·370
 Obese 92 0·44 0·14, 1·37 0·158 2·19 1·02, 4·71 0·045 1·04 0·54, 1·99 0·911
Model 2
 Normal weight 205 Reference Reference Reference
 Overweight 203 0·81 0·39, 1·70 0·583 2·49 1·30, 4·77 0·006 1·27 0·75, 2·13 0·373
 Obese 92 0·42 0·13, 1·29 0·129 2·19 1·00, 4·79 0·049 1·03 0·53, 2·00 0·940

PPWR, postpartum weight retention; PPWG, postpartum weight gain; PPWR + WG, postpartum weight retention + weight gain; RRR, relative risk ratio.

Results from multinomial logistic regression models.

*

Pregestational BMI: normal weight (<25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2).

Model 1: adjusted for age.

Model 2: adjusted for age, marital status (single/separated and married/cohabitating), education (basic: elementary and secondary school; middle: high school; college: at least college), parity (primiparous and multiparous) and socioeconomic status (high, middle and low).