TABLE 2.
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE | β | B | SE | B | b | SE | β |
Block 1 | |||||||||
Age | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
Gender | 0.98 | 0.39 | 0.17** | 0.76 | 0.38 | 0.13* | 0.64 | 0.38 | 0.11 |
Study site | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.16 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.15 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.12 |
Partner status | −0.54 | 0.44 | −0.08 | −0.58 | 0.42 | −0.09 | −0.79 | 0.42 | −0.12 |
Nativity | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.14* | 0.87 | 0.45 | 0.14 | 0.71 | 0.45 | 0.11 |
Hispanic heritage | −0.11 | 0.75 | −0.02 | −0.15 | 0.72 | −0.03 | −0.22 | 0.71 | −0.04 |
Student status | −1.25 | 0.46 | −0.20** | −1.14 | 0.44 | −0.18** | −0.85 | 0.45 | −0.13 |
Employment status | −1.41 | 0.53 | −20** | −1.71 | 0.51 | −0.24*** | −1.54 | 0.52 | −0.22** |
Financial strain | 0.80 | 0.33 | 0.16** | 0.59 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.12 |
Block 2 | |||||||||
Bicultural blendedness | - | - | - | −0.19 | 0.21 | −0.06 | −0.01 | 0.23 | −0.02 |
Bicultural harmony | - | - | - | −0.90 | 0.20 | −0.30*** | −0.78 | 0.20 | −0.26*** |
Block 3 | |||||||||
Social groundedness | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.07 | 0.02 | −0.23** |
Role repertoire | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.14 |
Note: R2 = 20.4% for Block 1, ΔR2 change = 8.0% for Block 2, ΔR2 change = 3.3% for Block 3. Variable coding: gender (0 = male, 1 = female), study site (0 = Florida, 1 = Arizona), partner status (0 = single, 1 = has a partner), nativity (0 = immigrant, 1 = non-immigrant), Hispanic heritage group (0 = other Hispanic heritage, 1 = Mexican heritage), student status (0 = current college student, 1 = non-college student), employment status (0 = unemployed, 1 = employed).
Abbreviations: b = unstandardized coefficient, SE = standard error, β = standardized coefficient.
p ≤ 0.05,
p ≤ 0.01,
p ≤ 0.001.