Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Audiol. 2020 Oct 1;60(4):282–292. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1826586

Table 5.

Quality of Hearing Scale Subscale Correlations with Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Sample

Speech Local Sounds Effort
Demographics/Hearing History
  Income Level 0.34* 0.40** 0.52** −0.21
Speech Perception
  Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition 0.31* 0.10 0.32* −0.36*
  Hearing in Noise Test for Children in Quiet 0.34* 0.22 0.55* −0.26
  Hearing in Noise Test for Children in Noise 0.31* 0.33* 0.31* −0.20
Language
  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - 4 0.32* 0.09 0.32* −0.39*
  CELF-5 Following Directions 0.42** 0.22 0.33* −0.44**
Executive Functioning (Individually-Administered)
  Visual Digit Span Forward 0.37* 0.11 0.36* −0.44**
  Visual Digit Span Backward 0.37* 0.21 0.41** −0.40**
  Letter-Number Sequencing 0.37* 0.18 0.40** −0.37*
Executive Functioning (Parent-Report)
  LEAF Attention −0.41** −0.16 −0.22 0.41**
  LEAF Processing Speed −0.46** −0.27a −0.43** 0.53***
  LEAF Working Memory −0.47** −0.19 −0.34* 0.53***
  BRIEF-2 Shift −0.60*** −0.28a −0.33* 0.48**
  BRIEF-2 Working Memory −0.49** −0.17 −0.31* 0.50**

Note: Values are Pearson correlations; Local=Localization subscale; Income Level coded on a 1 (under $20,000) to 8 ($150,000+) scale; CELF=Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals; LEAF=Learning, Executive, and Attention Functioning Scale; BRIEF-2=Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function.

a

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01

***

p < .001