TABLE 2.

Comparison of the quantification results between TMT and PRM analyses of the 10 candidate proteins.

Accession	Gene Name	Protein	Group Ratio (TMT)a			Group Comparison (PRM)b
			120 d/90 d	150 d/120 d	150 d/90 d	120 d/90 d	150 d/120 d	150 d/90 d
P00340	LDHA	L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain	1.41	1.05	1.48	1.40	1.05	1.47
P07322	ENO3	Beta-enolase	1.24	0.97	1.20	1.17	1.21	1.41
A0A3Q3ATJ1	CACNA2D1	VWFA domain-containing protein	1.20	0.94	1.12	1.55	0.89	1.39
A1IMF0	UCH-L1	Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase	1.44	0.95	1.36	1.77	0.86	1.52
P16419	MYBPC2	Myosin-binding protein C, fast-type	1.24	0.96	1.20	1.35	0.96	1.28
Q8QGU2	FKBP12.6	Peptidylprolyl isomerase	0.77	0.88	0.68	0.83	0.90	0.75
P02467	COL1A2	Collagen alpha-2(I) chain	0.58	1.73	1.01	0.38	2.35	0.90
Q91348	Q91348	6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase	1.04	1.24	1.29	1.03	1.50	1.54
A0A0A0MQ61	GSTAL2	Uncharacterized protein	1.46	1.25	1.82	1.28	1.37	1.76
Q7SX63	HSP70	Heat shock protein 70	1.28	0.99	1.27	1.24	1.01	1.26

^aFold changes in protein abundance from the comparisons among 90, 120, and 150 d by tandem mass tag (TMT).

^bFold changes in protein abundance from the comparisons among 90, 120, and 150 d by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM).