Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;15:17534666211004238. doi: 10.1177/17534666211004238

Table 3.

Correlation between clinical measurements and quantitative HRCT findings at baseline.

Parameter, rho (p value) % predicted FVC % predicted DLCOa UCSD-SOBQ total score
Predicted DLCOa, % 0.2528 (p = 0.0029)
UCSD-SOBQ score −0.0543 (p = 0.53) −0.0385 (p = 0.65)
QLF whole lung, % −0.3656 (p < 0.0001) −0.3816 (p < 0.0001) 0.1049 (p = 0.29)
QILD whole lung, % −0.3328 (p = 0.0001) −0.2625 (p = 0.0019) 0.09297 (p = 0.25)
QLF whole lung, ml −0.2699 (p = 0.0014) −0.3025 (p = 0.0003) 0.0537 (p = 0.53)
QILD whole lung, ml −0.1737 (p = 0.0423) −0.1254 (p = 0.14) 0.0583 (p = 0.50)
a

QILD = QLF + QGG + QHC; QLF (ml) was derived from the product of CT TLC volume and QLF (%); Similarly, QILD (ml) was derived from the product of CT TLC volume and QILD (%).

DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity; HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; QILD, quantitative interstitial lung disease; QLF, quantitative lung fibrosis; SD, standard deviation; TLC, total lung capacity; UCSD-SOBQ, University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire.