Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;11(3):365–377. doi: 10.1177/2192568220901689

Table 2.

Compiled Data of Outcomes Including Cord Edema/Inflammation, Neuronal Sprouting, Cystic Cavitation, and Apoptosis Comparing Intervention to Control.

Study Outcomes Measured Results—Control Results—NSAIDs Significance Level
Cord edema/inflammation
 Campolo et al40,a Total myeloperoxidase activity 300 mU/g Nap: 250 mU/g, ATB-346: 125 mU/g P < .05 with nap compared to control and P < .05 for ATB-346 compared to nap
TNF-α levels 100 mU/g Nap: 70 mU/g, ATB-346: 50 mU/g P < .05 when nap compared to control and ATB-346 compared to nap
Histological damage score based on number of eosinophilic neurons. 1 = 1-5 neurons, 2 = 5-10 neurons, 3 = >10, 1 = <1/3 of gray matter, 5 = 1/3-1/2 of gray matter, 6 = >1/2 of gray matter 5 Nap: 3, ATB-346: 1 P < .05 when nap compared to control; P < .05 when ATB-346 compared to nap
 Hakan el al30,a Myeloperoxidase activity (U/g) No SCI: 3.8 U/g
SCI control: 6.5
Mel: 4.0 P < .001 with mel compared to saline
 Guth et al32 Total lesion size measuring edema 21 days after injury (mm2) Control: 1.62 ± 0.11
LPS: 1.63 ± 0.14
Preg: 1.84 ± 0.1
DHEA: 1.68 ± 0.12
Ind: 1.63
LPS and ind: 1.63 ± 0.13
Preg, LPS, and ind: 1.14 ± 0.14
DHEA, LPS, and ind: 1.12 ± 0.08
P < .01 for preg, LPS, and ind
P < .01 for DHEA, LPS and ind
Experiment rerun with larger sample sizes measuring edema (mm2) Control: 1.89 ± 0.12
Preg and LPS: 1.77 ± 0.14
Preg, LPS, and ind: 1.33 ± 0.14 P < .05 for preg, LPS, and ind compared to control
 Simpson et al34 SCI evaluation based on scale of mild (1) to marked (4) as determined by the authors 2.4 ± 0.5 SCI-nifedipine: 2.1 ± 0.6
SCI-indomethacin: 0.8 ± 0.3
Unknown
 Sharma et al13 Spinal cord water content (%) using microscope for evaluation rostral to SCI Non-SCI control: 71.56 ± 0.42
SCI control: 74.48 ± 0.38
SCI with 1 mg ind: 74.76 ± 0.53 P > .05
SCI with 5 mg ind: 74.68 ± 0.88 P > .05
SCI with 10 mg ind: 72.74 ± 0.32 P < .05
Spinal cord water content (%) using microscope for evaluation caudal to SCI Non-SCI control: 71.38 ± 0.42
SCI control: 75.34 ± 0.42
SCI with 1 mg ind: 75.78 ± 0.63 P > .05
SCI with 5 mg ind: 74.89 ± 0.61 P > .05
SCI with 10 mg ind: 72.64 ± 0.38 P < .05
Spinal cord water content (%) using microscope for evaluation of total spinal cord injury Non-SCI control: 72.03 ± 0.38
SCI control:76.58 ± 0.34
SCI with 1 mg ind: 76.84 ± 0.76 P > .05
SCI with 5 mg ind: 77.23 ± 0.67 P > .05
SCI with 10 mg ind: 74.48 ± 0.52 P < .05
 Winkler et al51 Water content in spinal cord (%) Non-SCI control: 72.03 SCI treated with ind: 73.31 P < .05 with ind compared to control
SCI control: 76.23
 Sharma et al14 Water content of spinal cord (%) Non-SCI control group (%): 67.64 ± 0.23 Non-SCI group treated with 5 mg/kg ind: 66.58 ± 0.32
Non-SCI with 10 mg/kg ind: 66.74 ± 0.38
N/A
Control SCI: 70.18 ± 0.34 5 mg/kg ind with SCI: 69.43 ± 0.33 P < .01
Control SCI: 70.18 ± 0.34 10 mg/kg ind with SCI: 68.28 ± 0.18 P < .01
 Hains et al33 Inflammation evaluated by PGE2 immunohistochemistry at 12 hours postinjury 6389 ± 784 Staining intensity for NS-398: 2331 ± 1177 P < .05
Neuronal sprouting/myelination
 Wang et al36,a Central horn 5-HT fiber length in complete transection model at 5 weeks (µm) 0 Ibu at 35 mg: 5, Ibu at 70 mg: 11 P < .05 ibu; regeneration seen across transection in ibu group
Contusion model fiber length at 2 weeks (µm) 75 Nap: 100, ibu: 90 P > .05 for nap and ibu
Contusion model fiber length at 6 weeks (µm) 50 Nap: 4, ibu: 200 P < .01 for ibu group
Optical density of BDA-labeled CST fibers rostral to injury 0.12 Ibu: 0.7 P < .05 for ibu group
 Sharp et al35,a Axonal sprouting 27 axons per high-powered section Ibu: 25 axons per high-powered section P > .05
 Xing et al37,a Total oligodentrocytes 6-10 mm rostral to lesion 5 days after SCI injury 1600 Ibu: 1800, ind: 1800, nap: 1600 P < .05 for ibu and ind
Total oligodentrocytes 6-10 mm caudal to lesion 5 days after SCI injury 1500 Ind: 2000, ibu: 1950, nap: 1450 P < .05 for ibu and ind
MBP-labeled myelin 3-4 mm caudal to lesion 6 weeks after SCI (units measured as arbitrary units) 36 Nap: 40, ibu: 100, ind 50 Ibu P < .05; qualitatively increased myelination for ind and ibu groups seen on electron microscopy
3-4 mm caudal with Luxol fast blue stained myelin (units measured as arbitrary units) 25 Nap: 22, ibu: 100, ind: 75 P < .01 for ibu and ind
3-4 mm rostral with MBP-labeled myelin (units measured as arbitrary units) 42 Nap: 38, ind: 75, ibu: 100 P < .05 ibu; qualitatively increased myelination for ind and ibu groups seen on electron microscopy
3-4 mm rostral with LFB (units measured as arbitrary units) 45 Nap: 10, ind: 50, ibu: 105 P < .05 for ibu group
 Fu et al31,a CST sprouts/rat in dorsal over hemi-section rats 1 hour postinjury 5 sprouts Nap: 1, ibu: 31 P < .05 for ibu group
CST axons/slide 7-10 mm distal to injury 4 Nap: 3, ibu: 9 P < .05 for ibu group
5HT fiber length (mm) 8 Nap: 10, ibu: 17 P < .01 for ibu group
Serotonin fiber length (µm) 13 Ibu: 23 P < .05
# CST fiber >200 µm 1-2 mm from SCI in gray matter and at 3-4 mm, 5-6 mm, 7-8 mm, and 9-10 mm 0, 5, 5, 3, 0 15, 30, 31, 29, 25 P < .05
Gray and white matter CST fibers/rat found at least 1 mm distal to lesion 25 200 P < .05
Cystic cavitation
 Pedram et al38 Measured based on Rexel classification: 0 = normal with no vacuolization, 1 = mild with <10% cells injured, 2 = moderate 10-50%, 3 = severe with >50% Ventral horn gray matter: 0 Ventral horn gray matter for mel: 0 P > .05
Intermediate gray matter: 0.5 ± 0.57 Intermediate gray matter: 0 P > .05
Dorsal horn gray matter: 0 Dorsal horn gray matter: 0 P > .05
 Wang et al36,a Spared tissue 2 weeks after injury (µm) 300 Nap: 300, ibu: 550 P < .05 for ibu group compared to control/nap and nap, P > .05 compared to control
Spared tissue 6 weeks after injury (µm) 250 Nap: 250, ibu: 450 P < .05 for ibu group compared to control/nap and nap, P > .05 compared to control
 Redondo-Castro and Navarro39,a Total amount of spared tissue in epicenter of cord injury (µm2) 2.0 × 109 Ibu: 1.7 × 109 P > .05
Tissue spared at periphery of lesion (µm2) 4.0 × 109 Ibu: 3.5 × 109 P > .05
Myelinated tissue at different areas of the lesion (µm2) 2 000 000 at −3000 µm from epicenter, none at epicenter Ibu: 3 000 000 at −3000 µm P < .05 ibu versus control
 Guth et al32 Total lesion size (mm2) at 28 days Control: 0.93 ± 0.1
LPS: 0.49 ± 0.1
Ind: 1.05 ± 0.128 mm2
LPS and ind: 0.11 ± 0.4
P < .01 for LPS
P < .001 for LPS and ind
Total lesion size after crush injury at 28 days Control: 0.94 ± 0.13
LPS: 0.63 ± 0.09
Preg: 1.00 ± 0.11
DHEA: 0.94 ± 0.1
Ind: 1.05 ± 0.13
LPS and ind: 0.49 ± 0.11
Preg, LPS, ind: 0.3 ± 0.04
DHEA, LPS, ind: 0.33 ± 0.3
P < .01 for preg, LPS, and ind group
P > .05 for LPS and ind group
P < .01 for DHEA, LPS, and ind group
Crush injury repeated with increased sample size (mm2) Control: 0.99 ± 0.09
Preg and LPS: 0.94 ± 0.12 mm2
LPS and ind: 0.49 ± 0.08 mm2 P < .01 for LPS and ind group
 Simpson et al34 Total tissue loss based on author scale of mild to marked injury Sham control: 0.0 Sham ind: 0.0 Unknown
SCI control: 1.1 ± 0.4 SCI ind: 0.1 ± 0.1
 Hains et al33 Total viable tissue loss (%) 32.2 ± 2.7 NS-398: 17.6 ± 3.21 P < .05
Apoptosis of cells
 Campolo et al40,a TUNEL positive cells/field 4.8 Nap: 3
ATB-346: 1.8
Nap P < .001 compared to control, ATB P < .001 compared to nap
Densitometric data (OD m2) for antiapoptotic bcl2 100 Nap: 1600
ATB-346: 3700
P < .001 for ATB346 compared to nap
Proaopoptotic Bax units 4600 Nap: 1000
ATB-346: 700
P < .001 for nap and ATB-346 compared to control
 Hakan et al30,a % DNA fragmentation Control without SCI: 0.04
Control with SCI: 0.16
SCI + mel: 0.06 P < .01
 Xing et al37,a Total TUNEL (+) cells/section 6-10 mm rostral to lesion 5 days after injury 70 Nap: 70
Ibu: 45
Ind: 35
P < .01 for both ibu and ind; nearly all apoptotic cells were in white matter
Total TUNEL (+) cells/section 6-10 mm caudal to lesion 5 days after injury 45 Nap: 45
Ibu: 28
Ind: 27
P < .01 for both ibu and ind; nearly all apoptotic cells were in white matter

Abbreviations: NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; ind, indomethacin; ibu, ibuprofen; nap, naproxen; mel, meloxicam; preg, pregnenolone.

a Data estimated from figures in the original article.