Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):1825–1832.

Table 5.

Comparison of clinical and pathological features and miR-145 and miR-205 relative expression levels among 84 cervical cancer patients (x̅ ± sd)

Category Case miR-145 T P miR-205 t P
Age 0.573 0.568 0.241 0.810
    ≥50 years 48 0.412±0.254 1.244±0.349
    <50 years 36 0.442±0.213 1.262±0.323
Pathological type 0.099 0.921 0.250 0.803
    Squamous cell carcinoma 75 0.425±0.259 1.238±0.342
    Adenocarcinoma 9 0.434±0.241 1.268±0.324
Tumor volume 3.928 <0.001 3.937 <0.001
    ≥5 cm 49 0.325±0.178 1.426±0.398
    <5 cm 35 0.521±0.279 1.124±0.257
Histological grade 0.691 0.492 1.642 0.105
    Well-differentiated 18 0.439±0.264 1.196±0.287
    Moderately- and poorly-differentiated 66 0.399±0.204 1.352±0.374
Parauterine invasion 2.567 0.012 2.570 0.012
    Yes 15 0.315±0.186 1.389±0.373
    No 69 0.513±0.284 1.168±0.285
FIGO staging 3.217 0.002 3.472 <0.001
    I-II 68 0.547±0.297 1.154±0.269
    III-IV 16 0.307±0.178 1.439±0.371
Lymphatic metastasis 3.439 <0.001 4.115 <0.001
    Yes 64 0.529±0.257 1.162±0.254
    No 20 0.315±0.189 1.468±0.387

Note: miR-145, miRNA-145; miR-205, miRNA-205.