Table 3.
GHQ-4 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p |
BC (1 μg/m3 increase) | 0.86 [0.61–1.22] | 0.40 | 0.97 [0.69–1.38] | 0.87 | 0.95 [0.65–1.39] | 0.78 | 0.96 [0.64–1.43] | 0.84 |
Veg. coverage-1 km buffer (25% increase) | 0.85 [0.64–1.14] | 0.29 | 1.05 [0.78–1.40] | 0.75 | 1.06 [0.78–1.44] | 0.70 | 1.03 [0.75–1.41] | 0.86 |
View of green (10 units increase) | 1.03 [0.84–1.25] | 0.77 | 1.03 [0.84–1.26] | 0.78 | 0.95 [0.85–1.28] | 0.64 | 1.06 [0.87–1.30] | 0.57 |
Density of tree (25 trees/100 m increase) | 1.07 [0.72–1.60] | 0.73 | 1.12 [0.74–1.67] | 0.60 | 1.07 [0.96–1.06] | 0.74 | 1.06 [0.70–1.59] | 0.79 |
Noise from multi. Source Lden (1 dB increase) | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.50 | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.46 | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.52 | 1.01 [0.98–1.05] | 0.35 |
Canyon effect (1 unit increase) | 1.20 [0.80–1.80] | 0.38 | 1.29 [0.83–2.01] | 0.26 | 1.42 [0.91–2.23] | 0.12 | 1.32 [0.84–2.06] | 0.23 |
Corridor effect (1 unit increase) | 0.96 [0.66–1.41] | 0.85 | 1.04 [0.70–1.55] | 0.84 | 1.03 [0.00-1.53] | 0.86 | 1.10 [0.74–1.63] | 0.62 |
Social support (Poor vs strong) | 2.13 [1.44–3.13] | < 0.001 | 1.94 [1.29–2.92] | < 0.001 | ||||
Physical activity (Minimal active vs inactive) | 1.07 [0.74–1.55] | 0.70 | 1.13 [0.77–1.66] | 0.52 | ||||
Enough active vs inactive | 0.48 [0.30–0.79] | < 0.001 | 0.55 [0.34–0.88] | 0.01 | ||||
Chronic condition (Yes vs no) | 2.38 [1.67–3.39] | < 0.001 |
Notes: Models 2,3, 4 were adjusted for sex, age, family composition, reported household income, highest household educational level and year. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for physical activity and social support. Model 4 was additionally adjusted for chronic condition