Table 4.
ANXIETY DISORDERS | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p |
BC (1 μg/m3 increase) | 1.07 [0.76–1.51] | 0.68 | 1.09 [0.76–1.57] | 0.62 | 1.16 [0.78–1.71] | 0.47 | 1.16 [0.77–1.74] | 0.47 |
Veg. coverage-1 km buffer (25% increase) | 0.77 [0.51–1.79] | 0.21 | 1.04 [0.70–1.55] | 0.83 | 1.07 [0.72–1.61] | 0.72 | 1.00 [0.65–1.56] | 0.97 |
View of green (10 units increase) | 1.08 [0.85–1.45] | 0.55 | 1.12 [0.87–1.49] | 0.81 | 1.01 [0.88–1.50] | 0.99 | 1.00 [0.89–1.51] | 0.82 |
Density of tree (25 trees/100 m increase) | 0.83 [0.47–1.46] | 0.51 | 0.91 [0.51–1.63] | 0.37 | 0.77 [0.45–1.30] | 0.31 | 0.76 [0.44–1.26] | 0.29 |
Noise from multi. Source Lden (1 dB increase) | 1.01 [0.97–1.05] | 0.50 | 1.00 [0.97–1.04] | 0.76 | 1.00 [0.96–1.03] | 0.32 | 1.00 [0.97–1.04] | 0.27 |
Canyon effect (1 unit increase) | 1.02 [0.61–1.68] | 0.94 | 1.14 [0.66–1.98] | 0.63 | 1.13 [0.61–2.10] | 0.70 | 1.07 [0.58–1.97] | 0.82 |
Corridor effect (1 unit increase) | 0.91 [0.56–1.46] | 0.69 | 0.99 [0.59–1.69] | 0.99 | 0.98 [0.57–1.67] | 0.94 | 1.01 [0.59–1.74] | 0.97 |
Social support (Poor vs strong) | 5.52 [3.57–8.54] | < 0.001 | 4.99 [3.22–7.74] | < 0.001 | ||||
Physical activity (Minimal active vs inactive) | 0.59 [0.35–1.01] | 0.06 | 0.63 [0.37–1.07] | 0.09 | ||||
Enough active vs inactive | 0.57 [0.30–1.07] | 0.08 | 0.67 [0.37–1.22] | 0.19 | ||||
Chronic condition (Yes vs no) | 3.19 [1.89–5.41] | < 0.001 |
Notes: Models 2,3, 4 were adjusted for sex, age, family composition, reported household income, highest household educational level and year. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for physical activity and social support. Model 4 was additionally adjusted for chronic condition