Table 6.
SLEEPING DISORDERS | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p | OR (95% IC) | p |
BC (1 μg/m3 increase) | 0.98 [0.74–1.29] | 0.87 | 1.21 [0.89–1.64] | 0.23 | 1.22 [0.90–1.66] | 0.19 | 1.26 [0.92–1.71] | 0.14 |
Veg. coverage-1 km buffer (25% increase) | 0.96 [0.74–1.26] | 0.78 | 1.15 [0.87–1.49] | 0.33 | 1.15 [0.87–1.52] | 0.32 | 1.13 [0.85–1.51] | 0.39 |
View of green (10 units increase) | 0.97 [0.83–1.10] | 0.50 | 0.97 [0.82–1.01] | 0.38 | 0.97 [0.82–1.15] | 0.46 | 0.98 [0.82–1.16] | 0.32 |
Density of tree (25 trees/100 m increase) | 0.96 [0.64–1.44] | 0.71 | 0.96 [0.62–1.47] | 0.72 | 0.90 [0.60–1.35] | 0.73 | 0.89 [0.60–1.33] | 0.78 |
Noise from multi. Source Lden (1 dB increase) | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.86 | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.85 | 1.01 [0.98–1.04] | 0.61 | 1.01 [0.99–1.04] | 0.58 |
Canyon effect (1 unit increase) | 1.03 [0.70–1.51] | 0.89 | 1.05 [0.71–1.56] | 0.79 | 1.03 [0.69–1.53] | 0.89 | 0.96 [0.65–1.44] | 0.86 |
Corridor effect (1 unit increase) | 0.92 [0.65–1.30] | 0.64 | 0.99 [0.69–1.42] | 0.95 | 0.99 [0.68–1.42] | 0.94 | 1.05 [0.73–1.51] | 0.81 |
Social support (Poor vs strong) | 2.76 [1.95–3.89] | < 0.001 | 2.60 [1.84–3.67] | < 0.001 | ||||
Physical activity (Minimal active vs inactive) | 0.84 [0.59–1.20] | 0.34 | 0.88 [0.62–1.26] | 0.49 | ||||
Enough active vs inactive | 0.91 [0.60–1.37] | 0.64 | 1.00 [0.67–1.51] | 0.99 | ||||
Chronic condition (Yes vs no) | 2.10 [1.52–2.91] | < 0.001 |
Notes: Models 2,3, 4 were adjusted for sex, age, family composition, reported household income, highest household educational level and year. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for physical activity and social support. Model 4 was additionally adjusted for chronic condition