Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2016 May 5;52(6):943–959. doi: 10.1037/dev0000117

Table 3.

Tests of interactions between age and different predictors in two random subsamples.

Sample A Sample B
Variable F df1 df2 p Significance F df1 df2 p Significance
Gender 0.63 2 7937 .534 6.96 2 8145 .001 ***
Income 10.24 2 7937 < .001 *** 4.47 2 8145 .012 *
Education 1.88 2 7937 .152 0.40 2 8145 .671
Work status 3.91 4 7935 .004 ** 7.06 4 8143 < .001 ***
Relationship status 6.21 4 7935 < .001 *** 7.03 4 8143 < .001 ***
Household size 2.91 4 7935 .020 * 4.77 4 8143 .001 ***
Children in household 2.79 2 7937 .061 0.27 2 8145 .764
Functional limitations 1.68 4 7935 .151 0.23 4 8143 .921
Volunteering 0.15 2 7933 .860 2.56 2 8141 .077
Political engagement 4.26 2 7933 .014 * 1.36 2 8141 .256
Religious engagement 4.37 2 7933 .013 * 0.25 2 8141 .781
No. of friends 1.28 2 7937 .278 0.72 2 8145 .488
Contact with friends 4.07 2 7931 .017 * 0.50 2 8139 .609
Contact with relatives 0.89 2 7931 .410 7.43 2 8139 .001 ***
Contact abroad 0.67 2 7931 .510 1.55 2 8139 .212
Contact online 3.12 2 7931 .044 * 1.40 2 8139 .248

Notes.

***

p < .001,

**

p <. 01,

*

p < .05.