Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;11(3):e040465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040465

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included studies*

Study Location Design Number (n) Age at inclusion (years) Gender (male) (n (%)) Smoking (n (%)) Proportion of ILD (n (%))† Disease duration (RA) (years) Disease activity‡ Other CTDs (n) ILD patterns (on HRCT) (n)
Alunno et al 201838 Italy Cross-sectional 252 61.7±0.8 56 (22.2) 37 (20.2) (n=183) 12.6±0.6
England et al 201939 USA Cross-sectional§ 1823 63.5±11.0 (90.1) (89.5) 90 (4.9) 11.1±11.5 4.0±1.6
Giles et al 201440 USA Cross-sectional§ 177 59±8¶ 71 (40.1) 105 (59.3) 120 (67.8) 9 (5–19) vs 8 (4–16)¶ 3.7 (2.9–4.4)¶ (CRP)
Chen et al 201341 China Cross-sectional 103 49.1±14.7 27 (26.2) 2 (1.9) 63 (61.2) 4.3±5.7 4.4±1.4
Chen et al 201542 China Cross-sectional 71 60.7±12.1** 37 (52.1) 35 (49.3) 49 (69.0) 12.8±10.3 vs 8.4±8.1 (n=68) 3.7±1.2 vs 3.3±1.7 (n=43)
Doyle et al 201543 USA Cross-sectional§ 75 61.5±12.7** 11 (14.7) 41 (54.7)
Abdel-Hamid et al 201944 Egypt Cross-sectional 50 45.8±12.3 2 (4.0) 19 (38.0) 9.8±6.6 4.7±1.3 0
Akiyama et al 201645 Japan Cross-sectional 395 58.5±13.1 49 (12.4) 69 (20.3) (n=340) 78 (19.7) 129.4±115.2 (months) 4.9±1.6 (n=372) 38 (SS, SSc, PM/DM, SLE)
Alexiou et al 200846 Greece Case–control 136 N/A (ILD 11/no ILD 125)
Correia et al 201947 USA Cross-sectional 453 59.6±15.7 (19.4) (6.0) 0
Fadda et al 201848 Egypt Cross-sectional 88 50.2±9.0 13 (14.8) 87 (98.9) 63 (71.6) 10.2±6.2 14 (1–32) vs 12 (3–25) (median (range)) (CDAI) 0 UIP 62%, NSIP 27%, Mixed 1%
Furukawa et al 201249 Japan Case–control 450 63.9±10.9** 89 (19.8) 130 (28.9) N/A (ILD 129/no ILD 321) 14.5±10.9**
Kakutani et al 201950 Japan Cross-sectional 2702 62.8±12.5 (17.8) (28.9) 261 (9.7) 9 (15) vs 10 (17) (median (IQR)) 3.2±1.0 (ESR)
Kelly et al 201451 UK Case–control 460 220 (47.8) N/A (ILD 230/no ILD 230)
Liu et al 201952 China Cross-sectional 101 54 (17) (median (IQR)) 26 (25.7) 23 (22.8) 7 (14) (median (IQR) 4.0±1.9
Matsuo et al 201853 Japan Cross-sectional 312 63.5±12.7 41 (13.1) 95 (30.4) 26 (8.3) 14.9±11.6 2.5±1.1 (CRP) 11 (not specified)
Mori et al 201254 Japan Cross-sectional 356 72.5 (12.3) (n=24) vs 59.0 (16) (n=302) (median (IQR)) 85 (23.9) 76 (21.3) 24 (6.7) 1.5 (6.3) (n=24) vs 0 (6) (n=302) (median (IQR)) UIP 5, NSIP 19
Ortancil et al 201155 Turkey Cross-sectional 67 57.4±13.5 14 (20.9) 12 (17.9) 10.2±11.7**
Park et al 201656 Korea Cross-sectional 83 53.7±10.1** 10 (12.0) 7 (8.4) UIP 6, indeterminate 1
Paulin et al 201957 Argentina Case–control 118 56.7±15.7 26 (22.0) 52 (44.1) N/A (ILD 52/no ILD 66) 6 (8) (median (IQR)) 3.4±1.1
Restrepo et al 201558 USA Cross-sectional 779 53.7±13.3 (n=632)** 161 (25.5) (n=632) 357 (56.5) (n=632) 69 (8.9) 10.5±10.3¶ 5.4±1.4**
Rocha-Munoz et al 201559 Mexico Case–control 81 51.0 (36.0–72.0) vs 49.0 (24.0–73.0) (median (range)) 22 (27.2) N/A (ILD 39/no ILD 42) 7.0 (1.0–35.0) vs 6.5 (0.75–25.0) (median (range)) 3.9 (1.7–5.3) vs 2.5 (1.7–5.1) (median (range)) 0
Sargin et al 201860 Turkey Cross-sectional 83 59.3±12.1 20 (24.1) 9 (10.8) 43 (51.8) 0
Sulaiman et al 201961 Malaysia Cross-sectional 159 48.3±14.1 25 (15.7) 21 (13.2) 4.7±0.9 (ESR) 0
Tian et al 201662 China Cross-sectional 75 29 (38.7) 37 (49.3)
Wang et al 201563 China Cross-sectional 41 60.7±12.4** 20 (48.8) 25 (61.0) 108 (5–360) vs 72 (2–552) (months) (median (range))
Yang et al 201964 Korea Case–control 308 57.0±12.0** 76 (24.7) 39 (17.7) (n=220) N/A (ILD 77/no ILD 231) 11.0±7.3**
Yin et al 201465 China Cross-sectional 285 51.7±13.4** 74 (26.0) 59 (20.7) 71 (24.9) 9.0 (16.0) vs 4.0 (9.1) (median (IQR)) 5.4±1.7 61 (SS 41, SSc 7, PM/DM 4, SLE 16)††
Zhang et al 201866 China Case–control 75 41–69 vs 40–70 (range) 30 (40.0) N/A (ILD 28/no ILD 47) 0

*Comparisons correspond to RA-ILD vs RA without ILD and the values are expressed as mean±SD or number (proportion) unless otherwise specified.

†N/A indicates not applicable due to case–control studies.

‡Disease activity was estimated using disease activity score (DAS) 28 unless otherwise specified and a laboratory marker used to calculate the score was described as either ESR or CRP if it was specified.

§A prospective study while all of the other studies were retrospectively designed.

¶Unknown statistics.

**Calculated combining the figure in both comparative groups.

††Some patients had multiple CTDs.

CDAI, clinical disease activity index; CRP, C-reactive protein; CTD, connective tissue disease; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; HRCT, high-resolution CT; ILD, interstitial lung disease; NSIP, non-specific interstitial pneumonia; PM/DM, polymyositis/dermatomyositis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SS, Sjögren syndrome; SSc, systemic sclerosis; UIP, usual interstitial pneumonia.;