Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;1(2):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.07.001

Table 1.

Comparison of outcomes after euploid frozen embryo transfer stratified by inner cell mass and trophectoderm blastocyst grades.

Grade euFET (n) Implantationa P valueb Clinical pregnancyc P valueb Live birthd P valueb Clinical miscarriagee P valueb Biochemical pregnancy lossf P valueb
ICM
 A 217 185 (85) .24 164 (76) .26 145 (67) .08 18 (11) .38 19 (10) .45
 B 405 327 (81) 293 (72) 244 (60) 47 (16) 31 (9)
 C 38 29 (81) 24 (63) 19 (50) 5 (21) 5 (17)
TE
 A 312 259 (83) .38 232 (74) .09 203 (65) .01 28 (12) .25 24 (9) .37
 B 277 228 (82) 205 (75) 172 (62) 31 (15) 22 (10)
 C 71 54 (76) 44 (62) 33 (46) 11 (25) 9 (17)

Note: Values are number (percentage) unless specified otherwise. euFET = euploid frozen embryo transfer; ICM = inner cell mass; TE = trophectoderm.

a

Implantation was defined as β-human chorionic gonadotropin level > 5 mIU/mL.

b

Chi-square analysis.

c

Clinical pregnancy was defined as a visualized gestational sac.

d

Live birth was defined as delivery of a neonate at or beyond 24 weeks.

e

Clinical miscarriage rate was calculated per clinical pregnancy.

f

Biochemical pregnancy loss was defined as loss of pregnancy after conception and before visualization of a gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasound. Biochemical pregnancy loss rate was calculated per implantation.