Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248809

Table 4. Network performance for patella.

Patella
Observed cases (n = 600) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Youden’s J AUC (95% CI)
A
A 5 80 83 0.63 0.79 (0.67 to 0.86)
1 5 80 85 0.65 0.81 (0.68 to 0.89)
1a 2 100 94 0.94 0.97 (0.93 to 0.99)
B
B 6 100 90 0.90 0.94 (0.91 to 0.97)
1 6 100 90 0.90 0.93 (0.90 to 0.97)
…1 3 100 78 0.78 0.86 (0.76 to 0.95)
…2 3 100 89 0.89 0.95 (0.89 to 0.99)
C
C 29 90 86 0.75 0.90 (0.79 to 0.97)
1 11 91 86 0.76 0.89 (0.74 to 0.97)
…1 6 100 85 0.85 0.94 (0.89 to 0.99)
…3 5 60 89 0.49 0.75 (0.44 to 0.96)
2 8 100 88 0.88 0.97 (0.93 to 0.99)
3 10 80 97 0.77 0.88 (0.70 to 0.98)
Custom classes
Displaced 21 81 91 0.72 0.88 (0.76 to 0.97

Table showing network performance for the different AO-OTA classes as well as other fracture descriptors, letter corresponds to fracture type, first number to group, second number to subgroup and last letter to qualifiers. The observed cases column correspond to the number of observed fractures by the reviewers. Note that an exam can appear several times as the category B1.1 will belong to both the overall B-type, B1 group and B1.1 subgroup at the same time.