Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 25;2021:6633700. doi: 10.1155/2021/6633700

Table 4.

Diagnostic accuracy of TG/HDL-C and TyG in predicting lifetime cardiovascular risk and their optimal cutoff values.

Predictors Overall Men Women
Value (CI 95%) Value (CI 95%) Value (CI 95%)
TG/HDL-C
 Optimal cutoffa 2.64 3.90 2.64
 AUC 0.77 (0.71–0.83) 0.80 (0.70–0.90) 0.74 (0.65–0.83)
 Sensitivity 0.86 (0.76–0.94) 0.66 (0.49–0.80) 0.86 (0.68–0.96)
 Specificity 0.60 (0.54–0.67) 0.87 (0.74–0.95) 0.60 (0.52–0.67)
 PPV 0.39 (0.33–0.60) 0.81 (0.64–0.90) 0.26 (0.20–0.58)
 NPV 0.94 (0.88–0.95) 0.75 (0.60–0.90) 0.96 (0.90–0.97)

TyG
 Optimal cutoffa 9.04 8.95 9.04
 AUC 0.80 (0.74–0.86) 0.79 (0.69–0.89) 0.80 (0.72–0.88)
 Sensitivity 0.64 (0.51–0.76) 0.68 (0.51–0.82) 0.66 (0.46–0.82)
 Specificity 0.83 (0.77–0.88) 0.80 (0.66–0.91) 0.82 (0.76–0.88)
 PPV 0.53 (0.44–0.66) 0.74 (0.58–0.86) 0.38 (0.29–0.60)
 NPV 0.88 (0.82–0.92) 0.76 (0.60–0.88) 0.94 (0.87–0.96)

AUC, area under the curve; TG/HDL-C, triglycerides to HDL-cholesterol ratio; TyG, triglyceride glucose index; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.