Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis to explore expecting variables for workers' mental health.

	Crude OR	95% CI	Adjusted OR	95% CI
Explanatory variables: Risk perception (agree and strongly agree)*
Experienced taking care of confirmed patients (yes)	3.92	2.31–6.64	3.72	2.13–6.50
Experienced being quarantined (yes)	2.85	1.29–6.33	2.60	1.06–6.39
Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-9 items (SAVE-9) score	1.17	1.09–1.16	1.12	1.07–1.17
Explanatory variables: SAVE-9 ≥ 21**
Sex (female)	2.54	1.62–4.00	2.36	1.47–3.80
Risk perception score	1.53	1.26–1.86	1.50	1.21–1.84
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items (PHQ-9) score	1.16	1.10–1.22	1.10	1.03–1.18
Explanatory variables: Unhealthy behavior***
Sex (male)	1.48	1.01–2.53	2.11	1.17–3.80
Junior (20~39 years old)	2.35	1.36–4.07	1.92	1.06–3.46
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items score	1.15	1.09–1.21	1.09	1.01–1.17
Insomnia Severity Index score	1.12	1.07–1.18	1.07	1.01–1.14

^*Logistic regression analysis with forward (conditional) method was performed, and age, marital status, job, years of employment, unhealthy behavior, patient health questionnaire-9 items score, and insomnia severity index score were excluded in the final model.

^**Logistic regression analysis with forward (conditional) methods was performed, and age, marital status, job, years of employment, unhealthy behavior, and insomnia severity index score were excluded in the final model.

^***Logistic regression analysis with forward (conditional) method was done, and marital status, job, years of employment, risky perception score, and stress and anxiety due to viral epidemic scale score were excluded in the final model.