Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;12:621208. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.621208

TABLE 1.

The characteristics of included studies.

Author Year Study design Gender (M/F) Age (year) Sample size Intervention and dose Treatment duration Main outcomes Reference
Experimental Control Experimental Control
Jiang W 2014 Prospective 0/50 29.3 ± 9.7 32.5 ± 11.5 25 25 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 200 mg bid + P 5–10 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + P 5–10 mg qd 12w PLT, IgG, Schirmer’s test, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, effective rate, AEs Jiang et al. (2014)
Jiang DX 2016 Prospective 0/60 28–76 30 30 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG, AEs Jiang et al. (2016)
Xia ZB 2017 Prospective 0/100 24–76 50 50 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG Xia et al. (2017)
Xu D 2017 Prospective 12/82 28–77 47 47 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 3 m ESR, RF, PLT, IgG, Schirmer's test, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, effective rate, AEs Xu et al. (2017)
Li CJ 2018 Prospective 29/39 NF 34 34 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, effective rate, AEs Li et al. (2018)
Luo QW 2018 Prospective 9/71 30–76 40 40 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 3 m Effective rate, AEs Luo et al. (2018)
Liao Y 2018 Prospective 0/40 25–69 20 20 IGU 25 mg qd-bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + TGP 0.6 g tid HCQ 0.2 g bid + TGP 0.6 g tid 12w ESR, IgG Liao (2018)
Wang Y 2018 Retrospective 13/63 27–78 38 38 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG, effective rate Wang (2018)
Bai J 2019 Prospective NF 25–76 30 30 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd LEF 10–50 mg qd + HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w RF, IgG, ESR, AEs, ESSDAI, ESSPRI Bai and Jiao (2019)
Ji JH 2019 Prospective 10/72 30–65 41 41 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, PLT, IgG, Schirmer's test, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, effective rate Ji and Cheng (2019)
Wang YL 2019 Prospective 5/59 60–83 32 32 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.1 g bid + TGP 0.6 g bid HCQ 0.1 g bid + TGP 0.6 g bid 12w ESR, RF, IgG, Schirmer's test, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, effective rate, AEs Wang et al. (2019)
Zhang J 2019 Prospective 25/61 24–63 43 43 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 200 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, PLT, IgG, Schirmer's test, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, effective rate, AEs Wang et al. (2019)
Zhang XY 2019 Prospective 36/84 28–71 60 60 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 3 m Schirmer's test, ESSDAI, effective rate Zhang (2019)
Zhao L 2019 Prospective 47/35 35–75 41 41 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG, effective rate, AEs Zhao (2019)
Li RR 2020 Prospective 0/46 23–77 23 23 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, IgG, Salivary flow rate, ESSPRI, effective rate, AEs Li and Long (2020)
Lin T 2020 Prospective 15/75 32–75 45 45 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w Effective rate, AEs Lin and Zhang (2020)
Jiang W 2020 Prospective NF 29.3 ± 9.7 25 25 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2 g bid + P 10 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + P 10 mg qd 12w PLT, IgG, Schirmer's test, ESSPRI, ESSDAI, AEs Jiang W. et al. (2020)
Wang ZH 2020 Prospective 15/45 32–78 30 30 IGU 25 mg bid + HCQ 0.2–0.4 g bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2–0.4 g bid + MP 8 mg qd NF Effective rate Wang and Wang. (2020)
Yu WJ 2020 Prospective 33/43 20–50 38 38 IGU 25 mg bid + MP 8 mg qd HCQ 0.2 g bid + MP 8 mg qd 12w ESR, RF, IgG Yu (2020)

M, male; F, female; IGU, iguratimod; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; P, prednisone; MP, methyl prednisolone; TGP, the total glucosides of paeony; NF, not found; ESSPRI, EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome patient reported index; ESSDAI, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome disease activity index; AEs, adverse event rates; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RF, rheumatoid factor; IgG, immunoglobulin G; LEF, leflunomide.