Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;12:586569. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.586569

TABLE 3.

Comparison of missense mutation frequency in deceased 485 vs recovered patients from Gujarat dataset.

Gujarat mutation count (genomes)
Gujarat frequency (%)
NT mutation AA mutation Deceased (n = 63) Recovered (n = 256) Deceased Recovered SIFT score Functional effect p-Value
A23403G Asp614Gly 62 241 98.41 94.14 0.30 Benign/tolerated 0.164016
C14408T Pro4715Leu 61 234 96.83 91.41 0.31 Benign/tolerated 0.144062
G25563T Gln57His 39 142 61.90 55.47 0.00 Deleterious 0.355651
C28854T Ser194Leu 30 90 47.62 35.16 0.00 Deleterious 0.067355
G16078A Val5272Ile 7 10 11.11 3.91 0.00 Deleterious 0.022562
G23311T Glu583Asp 5 10 7.94 3.91 0.33 Benign/tolerated 0.175819
C23277T Thr572Ile 4 5 6.35 1.95 0.57 Benign/tolerated 0.059057
G21724T Leu54Phe 3 39 4.76 15.23 0.69 Benign/tolerated 0.027646
C18568T Leu6102Phe 2 33 3.17 12.89 0.01 Deleterious 0.027074
A2292C Gln676Pro 2 31 3.17 12.11 0.05 Deleterious 0.036972