Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;21:171. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01530-2

Table 5.

Mean crestal bone loss (mesial) one year after placement by study variables

Study variables (pts = number of patientsa, n = number of implants) Mean crestal bone loss mesially (SD) mm Unadjusted β (95% CI)b p value Adjusted β (95% CI)c p value
Gender
 Male (pts = 152, n = 610) 0.78 (0.73) Ref Ref
 Female (pts = 302, n = 1063) 0.72 (0.66)  − 0.06 (− 0.17, 0.04) 0.00 (− 0.09, 0.09)
p = 0.233 p = 0.963
Age
 20–40 (pts = 124, n = 332) 0.63 (0.72) Ref Ref
 41–60 (pts = 198, n = 751) 0.68 (0.64) 0.06 (− 0.06, 0.18)  − 0.10 (− 0.19, 0.00)
  > 60 (pts = 132, n = 590) 0.89 (0.70) 0.26 (0.13, 0.39)  − 0.04 (− 0.15, 0.07)
p < 0.001 p = 0.104
Case type
 Single crown (n = 780) 0.30 (0.43) Ref Ref
 FDP group (n = 893) 1.13 (0.63) 0.86 (0.80, 0.92) 0.86 (0.81, 0.92)
p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Medical condition
 No (pts = 291, n = 1031) 0.67 (0.66) Ref Ref
 Yes (pts = 163, n = 642) 0.86 (0.71) 0.17 (0.07, 0.27) 0.07 (− 0.01, 0.15)
p = 0.001 p = 0.080
Smoking
 No (pts = 396, n = 1482) 0.75 (0.67) Ref Ref
 Yes (pts = 58, n = 191) 0.68 (0.79)  − 0.01 (− 0.16, 0.14) 0.00 (− 0.13, 0.12)
p = 0.905 p = 0.988
Implant abutment connection
 Screw (n = 1607) 0.75 (0.69) Ref Ref
 Cement (n = 66) 0.56 (0.56)  − 0.14 (− 0.33, 0.04)  − 0.06 (− 0.21, 0.08)
p = 0.128 p = 0.394
Implant position (sextant)
 UR posterior (n = 347) 0.77 (0.73) Ref Ref
 Upper anterior (n = 176) 0.70 (0.60)  − 0.10 (− 0.21, 0.02)  − 0.15 (− 0.25, − 0.05)
 UL posterior (n = 277) 0.73 (0.69)  − 0.01 (− 0.11, 0.09) 0.03 (− 0.05, 0.11)
 LL posterior (n = 389) 0.72(0.70)  − 0.08 (− 0.17, 0.01)  − 0.01 (− 0.09, 0.06)
 Lower anterior (n = 92) 1.16 (0.68) 0.28 (0.13, 0.42) 0.12 (0.00, 0.25)
 LR posterior (n = 392) 0.67 (0.64)  − 0.08 (− 0.17, 0.01)  − 0.01 (− 0.09, 0.06)
p < 0.001 p = 0.002
Implant manufacturer
 Ankylos (n = 1125) 0.75 (0.69) Ref Ref
 Astra (n = 51) 0.46 (0.50)  − 0.30 (− 0.51, − 0.08)  − 0.30 (− 0.47, − 0.13)
 Xive (n = 485) 0.76 (0.69) 0.07 (− 0.03, 0.17) 0.04 (− 0.04, 0.12)
 Frialit (n = 12) 0.58 (0.63)  − 0.26 (− 0.67, 0.15)  − 0.23 (− 0.56, 0.09)
p = 0.008 p < 0.001
Operator
 Maxillofacial (pts = 217, n = 854) 0.78 (0.70) Ref Ref
 Restorative (pts = 237, n = 819) 0.70 (0.68)  − 0.02 (− 0.12, 0.08) 0.09 (0.02, 0.17)
p = 0.666 p = 0.018

aNumber of patients (pts) is only presented for patient level variables

bEstimates and confidence intervals derived from mixed linear regression models, implants clustered within patients

cEstimates and confidence intervals derived from mixed linear regression models, implants clustered within patients, adjusted for all other factors in the table