Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;26(4):288–e541. doi: 10.1002/onco.13712
Title Response Rate
Number of Patients Screened 9
Number of Patients Enrolled 4
Number of Patients Evaluable for Toxicity 4
Number of Patients Evaluated for Efficacy 4
Evaluation Method IMWG Response Criteria
Response Assessment SD n = 2 (50%)
Response Assessment PD n = 1 (25%)
Response Assessment OTHER n = 1 (25%)
(Median) Duration Assessments PFS 5.3 months, CI: 2.5–7.1
Waterfall plot (Figure 2 ) Waterfall plot of best percent change in M‐protein values and IMWG response. One patient had disease progression; two had stable disease, and one had a minimal response, based on M‐protein. There were no partial responses.
Outcome Notes The 2014 IMWG response criteria for multiple myeloma were used.