Table 1.
No. | Age (years) | Sex | Side | History | Intervention | Creatinine (mg/dL) | Percentage function of affected kidney (%) | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 34 | M | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 0.9 | 49 | Ureteral avulsion |
2 | 28 | M | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 0.7 | 45 | Ureteral avulsion |
3 | 38 | F | Right | Ureteral stone | Replacement of malpositioned PCN | 0.8 | 50 | Ureteral avulsion with retroperitoneal collection |
4 | 32 | M | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 0.8 | 47 | Ureteral avulsion |
5 | 24 | M | Left | Gun shot | PCN after detecting urinary leak | 1.4 | 43 | Retroperitoneal collection with ureteral loss |
6 | 30 | F | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 0.9 | 50 | Ureteral avulsion |
7 | 33 | M | Right | Ureteral stone | PCN | 1.2 | 46 | Ureteropelvic junction disruption |
8 | 31 | M | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 1.0 | 48 | Ureteral avulsion |
9 | 78 | M | Left | Ureteral stone | PCN | 1.7 | 45 | Ureteral avulsion |
M: male; F: female; PCN: percutaneous nephrosotomy tube placement. This table gives the basic patient profile with individual etiologies, preoperative creatinine levels, interventions performed before definitive surgery, split function (based on diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid scan), and the outcome of ureteric injuries.