Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;11(7):3300–3312. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7282

Table 1.

Effect of domestication status (progenitor vs. wild) and individual seed mass on a range of functional traits

Trait Progenitors compared with wild species Effect of logged individual seed mass
Growth experiment
Individual seed mass ×5.3** N/A
AGR NS NS
RGR NS NS
sRGR ×0.55* *** (slope = −0.07)
Root:shoot NS NS
Final leaf area NS * (slope = 0.43)
Final root area NS ** (slope = 0.63)
SLA NS Interaction with status***
NAR NS Interaction with status **,a
Competition experiment
Germination success Progenitors have higher germination success*** 3‐way interaction (seed mass × domestication status × stand type)*
Time to germination NS 3‐way interaction (seed mass × domestication status × stand type)***
Seedling survival NS NS
Seedling biomass × 2.7* ** (slope = 0.61)

Data in the second column show the magnitude of difference between primary progenitors and other wild species. Data in the third column show the effect of logged individual seed mass on the trait, including the size of the slope, when relevant. Three‐way interactions are with status and stand type (monoculture vs. mixture). Asterisks denote significant differences: * = p <.05, ** = p <.01, *** = p <.001. All variables were natural log transformed, except for RGR, sRGR, germination success and seeding survival.

a

This interaction was not significant after the removal of a datapoint of the crop progenitors, which had much lower NAR than other crop progenitors.