Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 2;28:28. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2021024

Table 3.

Parasite counts and efficacy.

Parasite Study/treatment groups Number of positive cats/number of cats in group Geometric mean parasite count (range) Efficacy1 (%) p-value2
Adult Toxocara cati Study 1, induced infection (Tennessee, USA)
 Placebo (control)3 10/10 29.5 (14–57) 100 <0.0001
 Treated4 0/10 0
Study 2, natural infection (Albania)
 Placebo (control) 10/10 12.1 (2–32) 98.8 <0.0001
 Treated 1/10 0.1 (0–3)
Dipylidium caninum Study 3, induced infection (South Africa)
 Placebo (control) 7/8 28.9 (8–267) 98.0 0.0018
 Treated 2/8 0.6 (3–9)
Study 4, natural infection (Albania)
 Placebo (control) 9/10 23.1 (3–143) 98.3 0.0001
 Treated 2/10 0.4 (1–12)
Study 5, natural infection (Mexico)
 Placebo (control) 7/10 5.6 (1–370) 93.2 0.0052
 Treated 1/10 0.4 (24)
1

Percent efficacy = 100[(C − T)/C], where C was the geometric mean among placebo controls and T was the geometric mean among the treated animals.

2

Two-sided probability value from analysis of variance on log-counts of the treated group and the placebo control group.

3

Mineral oil at 0.12 mL per kg bodyweight spot-on, once.

4

NexGard® Combo at 0.12 mL per kg bodyweight spot-on, once.