Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;15:655947. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.655947

Table 1.

Effect of tDCS on fear memory and fear extinction in healthy and clinical groups.

References Study type N/Groups Gender M/F (Mean age ± SD) Target area Target/return electrode position Polarity Size Online/offline stimulation Intensity/duration Type of CS/US Reinforcement rate Outcome measures Outcome direction
FEAR MEMORY
Asthana et al. (2013) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 49 healthy participants/anodal, cathodal and sham 24/25
(22.58 ± 2.24)
Left dlPFC F3/left mastoid Anodal/cathodal 35 cm2 Offline, after acquisition and break (10–20 min) 1 mA/12 min Colored blue and yellow squares/Scream 75% SCR Diminution of fear memory
Mungee et al. (2014) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 50 healthy participants/active and sham tDCSgroups 28/22
(N.R.)
Right dlPFC/vmPFC F4/contralateral supraorbital area Anodal 15 cm2 Offline, on day 2 immediately after reminding 1 mA/20 min Blue and yellow squares/Electrical shock 38% SCR - Enhancement of fear memory
Mungee et al. (2016) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 17 healthy participants/active and sham tDCS groups 5/12
(N.R.)
Right dlPFC/vmPFC F4/contralateral supraorbital area Cathodal 15 cm2 Offline, on day 2 immediately after reminding, 1 mA/20 min Blue and yellow squares/Electrical shock 38% SCR - No effect on fear memory
FEAR EXTINCTION
Abend et al. (2016) RCT, sham controlled, double blind 45 healthy participants/tDCS, tACS and sham groups 24/21
(25.2 ± 5.7)
mPFC Between Fpz and Fp1/occipital bone (Oz) Anodal 35 cm2 Online, during extinction 1.5 mA/20 min Two female faces/Scream 80% SCR, self-reported fear - Anodal tDCS led to overgeneralization
van't Wout et al. (2016) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 44 healthy participants/active and sham tDCS groups 23/21
(27.34 ± 8.18)
Left vmPFC AF3/contralateral mastoid Anodal 15 cm2 Online, started before and continued during extinction 2 mA/10 min Red, blue and yellow lights/Electrical shock 60% SCR - tDCS during the first extinction block enhanced late extinction of the second extinction block
Dittert et al. (2018) RCT, sham controlled, double blind 84 healthy participants/two active and two sham tDCS groups 38/46
(24.25 ± 4.07)
Right and left vmPFC Electrodes positions: M20, M21, I20, I21, J13, J14 for the left and M9, M10, I9, I10, J6, J7 for the right electrode pad (slightly below F7 and F8) Anodal 16 cm2 Online, started during the break between acquisition and extinction and lasted until the end of the extinction 1.5 mA/20 min Two female faces/Scream 80% SCR, self-report measures (valence, arousal and CS-US contingency STAI-X1, PANAS) -Enhancement of early extinction - No differential effect of current flow direction on early extinction - left anodal tDCS reduced state anxiety
Ganho-Ávila et al. (2019) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 41 healthy participants/cathodal and sham tDCS groups 0/41
(20.42 ± 4.99)
Right dlPFC F4/contralateral deltoid Cathodal 24.75cm2 Offline, on day 2, after verbal recall of CS+ color 1 mA/20 min Blue and yellow squares/Scream 75% SCR, self-report measures (valence, arousal, contingency and expectancy), STAI-S, AAT. - No short-term effect on fear extinction - Enhancement of fear memory retention - Enhancement of stimuli discrimination
Vicario et al. (2020b) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 23 healthy participants/anodal and sham tDCS groups 10/13
(24.15 ± 4.92)
Left vmPFC AF3/contralateral mastoid Anodal 25 cm2 Online, during extinction 2 mA/20 min Colored circles/Electrical shock 71% SCR -Enhanced fear extinction and recall
Ney et al. (2021) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 30 healthy participants/anodal and sham tDCS groups 10/20
(24.60 ± 7.30)
Left vmPFC AF3/contralateral mastoid Anodal 25 cm2 Offline, after extinction 2 mA/10 min Colored circles/Electrical shock 62.5% SCR - Anodal tDCS impaired fear extinction retention on day 2
CLINICAL GROUPS
van't Wout et al. (2017) RCT, sham controlled Blinding mode not reported 28 PTSD/two groups (stimulation during extinction learning vs after extinction) 28/0
(56.25 ± 12.3)
Left vmPFC AF3/contralateral mastoid process Anodal 25 cm2 Online and offline, during and after extinction 2 mA/10 min (single-session) Red, blue and yellow light./Electrical shock 60% SCR - Enhanced early fear extinction recall when tDCS was applied after extinction
Todder et al. (2018) RCT, within-subject sham controlled, double blind 12 refractory OCD patients/one group 7/5
(38.5 ± 12)
mPFC Fpz/right shoulder Anodal/cathodal 35 mm2 Offline, after exposure and between presentation of obsession provoking stimuli 2 mA/20 min (3 sessions for each polarity) Individualized anxiety provoking stimuli N/A 7-point VAS, Y-BOCS, HAMA, MADRS - Reduction of obsession-induced anxiety after cathodal stimulation
van't Wout-Frank et al. (2019) RCT, sham controlled, single blind 12 PTSD patients 12/0
(40.5 ± 8.8)
Left vmPFC AF3/right posterior occipital (PO8) Anodal 25 cm2 tDCS started simultaneously with VR, online 2 mA/25 min (6 sessions) N/A N/A SCR, self-reported PTSD symptoms - Greater decrease in SCR in real tDCS group - RealtDCS group continued to improve during the 1-month follow-up.

DlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Mpfc, medial prefrontal cortex; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; VR, virtual reality; OCD, Obsessive-Compulsive disorder; PTSD, Posttraumatic stress disorder; SCR, Skin conductance response; STAI-X1, State-trait anxiety inventory-state form; PANAS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; VAS, visual analog scale; AAT, approach avoidance task; MADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; Y-BOCS, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; N/A = not applicable.