TABLE 5.
Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test | ρ value |
CTR vs. 2 Gy | *** |
CTR vs. 4 Gy | *** |
CTR vs. 40 μM CDDP | *** |
CTR vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA | *** |
CTR vs. 40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy | *** |
CTR vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
CTR vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
CTR vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
2 Gy vs. 4 Gy | *** |
2 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP | *** |
2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA | *** |
2 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy | *** |
2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
2 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
4 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP | ns |
4 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA | ** |
4 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy | *** |
4 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
4 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
4 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA | ns |
40 μM CDDP vs. 40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA vs. 40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy | * |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4Gy | *** |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP + 2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy vs. 40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy | *** |
10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 2 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
40 μM CDDP + 4 Gy vs. 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA + 4 Gy | *** |
Different experimental conditions (CTR, control, 40 μM CDDP and 10 μM Pt(IV)Ac-POA 48 h-CT alone or combined with 2 or 4 Gy dose irradiation); ρ values: *ρ < 0.05; **ρ < 0.01; ***ρ < 0.001, ns, not significant.