Skip to main content
. 2021;21(1):149–156.

Table 5.

Comparison of volume percentage, surface percentage, average width and mineralization deposition rate of rat trabecular bone.

Group Trabecular volume percentage (%) Surface percentage (%) Average width (μm) Mineralization sedimentation rate (%)
Control group 19.68±2.44 3.30±1.16 200.40±7.86 0.72±0.08
Sham operation group 19.17±2.56 3.28±1.41 197.39±7.69 0.71±0.06
Model group 14.95±2.31*,# 8.54±1.43*,# 154.74±9.70*,# 1.15±0.14*,#
Experimental group 19.18±2.14Δ 3.20±1.07Δ 203.70±9.86Δ 0.74±0.10Δ
F value 5.374 18.612 27.991 27.636
P value 0.009 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
*

indicates that there is a difference compared with the control group (p<0.05),

#

indicates that there is a difference compared with the sham operation group (p<0.05),

Δ

indicates that there is a difference compared with the model group (p<0.05).