Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;18:E28. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200587

Table 2. Change in Outcomes Associated With New SNAP Eligibility Among SSI Recipients in Study of SNAP Eligibility, Food Security, and Health After a SNAP Policy Change, California, 2019–2020a .

Factor Baseline (n = 213) Follow-upb (n = 157) P Valuec
Food insecurity, n (%)
  Food secure 36 (16.9) 51 (32.5) <.001
  Food insecure 177 (83.1) 106 (67.5)
Healthy Food Index–2015, mean scored 44.3 43.6 .57
Alternative Healthy Food Index–2010, mean scored 45.4 44.8 .20
Stress, mean scoree 19.8 18.5 .32
Mean no. of unhealthy days in past 30 days 17.1 16.5 .96
General health status excellent/very good, n (%) 57 (26.8) 43 (27.6) <.001
Mean no. of trade-offsf 1.3 1.4 .82
Cost-related medication nonadherence, n (%)g 41 (24.1) 23 (17.7) .001
Weekly food budget shortfall, mean, $ 73.33 47.72 <.001
Used community food resources in past 30 days, n (%) 171 (83.0) 117 (75.5) <.001

Abbreviations: SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; SSI, Supplemental Security Income.

a

Baseline survey administered to Supplemental Security Income recipients during May–August 2019; follow-up survey administered September 2019–January 2020. Policy change in effect beginning June 1, 2019.

b

Among this group, 72.6% (n = 114) had received SNAP at time of follow-up survey.

c

Fisher exact test used for bivariate variables and Mann–Whitney U test used for continuous variables.

d

Scored from 0 to 100 with higher numbers indicating more nutritious dietary intake.

e

Scored from 0 to 40: low, 0–13; moderate, 14–26; high, 27–40.

f

Trade-offs defined as answering yes to 1 or 2 times per year, some months, or every month (compared with never).

g

Denominator is number of participants who answered question.