Table 2:
Results of GEE models for effect of intervention on HPV vaccine uptake, initiation, and completion
| Outcomes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPV vaccine uptake aRR (95% CI) | P-value | HPV vaccine initiation aRR (95%CI) | P-value | HPV vaccine completion aRR (95%CI) | P-value | |
| Model 1 | ||||||
| Intervention vs. Control | ||||||
| Group: Intervention | 1.14 (1.01, 1.30) | 0.03 | 1.11 (1.01, 1.22) | 0.02 | 1.33 (1.16, 1.42) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | ||||||
| Pre-intervention period vs. Post-intervention period | ||||||
| Group: Post-intervention | 1.14 (0.96, 1.35) | 0.14 | 1.04 (0.94, 1.14) | 0.5 | 0.91 (0.81, 1.03) | 0.13 |
| Model 3 | ||||||
| High intensity intervention vs. low intensity intervention† | ||||||
| Group: High intensity intervention | 1.09 (1.01, 1.21) | 0.02 | 1.06 (1.0, 1.12) | 0.04 | 1.03 (0.95, 1.11) | 0.5 |
aRR: Adjusted Relative risk. GEE: Generalized Estimating Equations. All GEE models are adjusted for students enrolled, proportion of male students, proportion of Caucasian students, and proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price meal program
High intensity intervention SBHCs had intervention scores >10