Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2021 Feb 25;39(12):1765–1772. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.006

Table 2:

Results of GEE models for effect of intervention on HPV vaccine uptake, initiation, and completion

Outcomes
HPV vaccine uptake aRR (95% CI) P-value HPV vaccine initiation aRR (95%CI) P-value HPV vaccine completion aRR (95%CI) P-value
Model 1
Intervention vs. Control
Group: Intervention 1.14 (1.01, 1.30) 0.03 1.11 (1.01, 1.22) 0.02 1.33 (1.16, 1.42) <0.001
Model 2
Pre-intervention period vs. Post-intervention period
Group: Post-intervention 1.14 (0.96, 1.35) 0.14 1.04 (0.94, 1.14) 0.5 0.91 (0.81, 1.03) 0.13
Model 3
High intensity intervention vs. low intensity intervention
Group: High intensity intervention 1.09 (1.01, 1.21) 0.02 1.06 (1.0, 1.12) 0.04 1.03 (0.95, 1.11) 0.5

aRR: Adjusted Relative risk. GEE: Generalized Estimating Equations. All GEE models are adjusted for students enrolled, proportion of male students, proportion of Caucasian students, and proportion of students eligible for free or reduced-price meal program

High intensity intervention SBHCs had intervention scores >10