Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;43(4):469–479. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02551-2

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics

Variable Overall
(n = 23)
Virtual dissection group
(n = 10)
Textbook group
(n = 13)
p
Age (years) 20.9 ± 0.6 21.0 ± 0.6 20.8 ± 0.4 0.23
Gender 0.97
 Males 16 (70%) 7 (70%) 9 (69%)
 Females 7 (30%) 3 (30%) 4 (31%)
Scoring arithmetic mean for passed examinations 26.9 ± 1.7 27.1 ± 2.1 26.7 ± 1.5 0.55
Scoring weighted mean for passed examinations 26.7 ± 2.0 26.9 ± 2.4 26.6 ± 1.6 0.70
Scoring obtained at the anatomy examination 25.3 ± 1.7 25.6 ± 2.4 25.2 ± 2.1 0.74
Number of repeated examinations 1.2 ± 1.6 0 [1] 1 [2] 0.27
Classification in the national selection test 1418 ± 938 1332 ± 643 1483 ± 1137 0.71
Scoring obtained at the preliminary test 0.65
 Absolute score 5 ± 1.7 5 [1] 5 [2]
 Relative score (%) 50 ± 17 50 [10] 50 [20]
Scoring obtained at the post-test 0.62
 Absolute score 10.9 ± 3.2 11.3 ± 3.7 10.6 ± 2.9
 Relative score (%) 68.2 ± 20.1 70.6 ± 23.4 66.3 ± 18.0
 Participants passing the examination (n)* 11 (47.8%) 5 (50%) 6 (46.1%)

Parametric variables were described as mean ± standard deviation; non parametric variables are reported as median with interquartile range (Q3−Q1) within square brackets

Preliminary comparisons of considered variables between virtual dissection vs textbook groups were performed by t-Student test or Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate, to verify the effectiveness of random allocation. A two-sided p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance

*The final post-experimental test provided a score which was coded as positive ['passed examination' (PE)] if it was greater than 70% of the maximum score obtainable