Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Oct 6;14(2):205–214. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0407

Table 1.

Physician use of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk assessment and screening tools.

Family
Medicine
n (%)
Internist
n (%)
OB/GYN
n (%)
Total
n (%)
Discussion of Cancer Family History
Used 246 (98.4%) 235 (94.0%) 246 (98.4%) 727 (96.9%)
Not used 4 (1.6%) 13 (5.2%) 3 (1.2%) 20 (2.7%)
Not familiar with this assessment 0 (0%) 2 (0.8%) 1 (0.4%) 3 (0.4%)
Breast Exam
Used 212 (84.8%) 200 (80.0%) 241 (96.4%) 653 (87.1%)
Not used 38 (15.2%) 48 (19.2%) 7 (2.8%) 93 (12.4%)
Not familiar with this assessment 0 (0%) 2 (0.8%) 2 (0.8%) 4 (0.5%)
Mammogram
Used 248 (99.2%) 240 (96.0%) 238 (95.2%) 696 (92.8%)
Not used 2 (0.8%) 9 (3.6%) 7 (2.8%) 18 (2.4%)
Not familiar with this assessment 0 (0%) 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.4%) 2 (0.3%)
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (e.g., Gail Model, BOADICEA, Claus, BRCAPRO, Cuzick-Tyrer)*
Used 110 (44.0%) 104 (41.7%) 168 (67.2%) 382 (50.9%)
Not used 88 (35.2%) 97 (38.8%) 59 (23.6%) 244 (32.5%)
Not familiar with this assessment 52 (20.8%) 49 (19.6%) 23 (9.2%) 124 (16.5%)
Genetic Testing for BRCA1 or BRCA2*
Used 114 (45.6%) 128 (51.2%) 202 (80.8%) 444 (59.2%)
Not used 133 (53.2%) 119 (47.6%) 48 (19.2%) 300 (40.0%)
Not familiar with this assessment 3 (1.2%) 3 (1.2%) 0 (0%) 6 (0.8%)
Multi-Gene Testing*
Used 62 (24.8%) 68 (27.2%) 130 (52.0%) 260 (34.7%)
Not used 146 (58.4%) 153 (61.2%) 101 (40.4%) 400 (53.3%)
Not familiar with this assessment 42 (16.8%) 29 (11.6%) 19 (7.6%) 90 (12.0%)
*

Indicates significant difference between provider types (p≤ 0.05)