Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Oct 6;14(2):205–214. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0407

Table 4.

Logistic regression models of physician demographics, familiarity and attitudes toward chemoprevention interventions.

Familiar with Cancer
Prevention Interventions
Attitude toward Cancer
Prevention Interventions
Odds Ratio
(OR)
95% CI Odds Ratio
(OR)
95% CI
Gender
 Female 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 Male 0.97 [.67, 1.42] 1.41 [.97, 2.03]
Age 1.00 [.96, 1.05] 1.00 [.90, 1.05]
Medical Specialty
 OB/GYN 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 Family medicine 0.20* [.13, .31] 4.43* [2.86, 6.85]
 Internist 0.36* [.23, .57] 3.57* [2.29, 5.56]
Geographic location
 Urban 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 Suburban 1.87* [1.25, 2.79] 0.72 [.49, 1.08]
 Rural/remote 0.97 [.53, 1.77] 0.63 [.35, 1.12]
Years practicing specialty 1.01 [.96, 1.07] 1.00 [.95, 1.05]
Type of practice
 Solo practice 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 Single Specialty Group* 0.54* [.31, .94] 1.30 [.75, 2.25]
 Multi-Specialty Group 0.68 [.38, 1.21] 1.29 [.73, 2.28]
 Direct hospital employee 0.54 [.27, 1.11] 1.40 [.70, 2.82]
 Faculty practice plan 0.51 [.18, 1.41] 0.74 [.27, 2.07]
Average number of patients
 1-15 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
 16-25 1.53 [.96, 2.43] 0.82 [.52, 1.29]
 26 or more 2.34* [1.32, 4.13] 0.73 [.43, 1.27]
*

Indicates significant difference between provider types (p≤ 0.05)