Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Oct 6;14(2):205–214. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0407

Table 5.

Recommended course of action for vignettes featuring patients at various levels of risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Family
Medicine
n (%)
Internist
n (%)
OB/GYN
n (%)
Total
n (%)
Patient 1 is 40 years old and has: No personal history of breast cancer; No personal history of DCIS; No personal history of LCIS; and no first-degree relative with breast cancer.
Continue routine care. 202 (80.8%) 188 (75.2%) 197 (78.8%) 587 (78.3%)
Order a screening mammogram for this patient.* 149 (59.6%) 136 (54.4%) 196 (78.4%) 481 (64.1%)
Talk with the patient about her lifestyle behaviors. 110 (44.0%) 112 (44.8%) 113 (45.2%) 335 (44.7%)
Discuss the pros and cons of getting genetic testing with this patient.* 19 (7.6%) 16 (6.4%) 5 (2.0%) 40 (5.3%)
Discuss the pros and cons of using a preventive agent with this patient. 10 (4.0%) 16 (6.4%) 7 (2.8%) 33 (4.4%)
Discuss the pros and cons of getting prophylactic surgery with this patient.* 10 (4.0%) 14 (5.6%) 1 (0.4%) 25 (3.3%)
Refer the patient to a specialist. 14 (5.6%) 17 (6.8%) 6 (2.4%) 37 (4.9%)
Patient 2 is 35 years old and has: No personal history of breast cancer; No personal history of DCIS; No personal history of LCIS; One first-degree relative with breast cancer, diagnosed before age 50; and one first-degree relative with ovarian cancer.
 Continue routine care.* 116 (46.4%) 90 (36.0%) 77 (30.8%) 283 (37.7%)
 Order a screening mammogram for this patient. 146 (58.4%) 139 (55.6%) 132 (52.8%) 417 (55.6%)
 Talk with the patient about her lifestyle behaviors. 139 (55.6%) 124 (49.6%) 120 (48.0%) 383 (51.1%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of getting genetic testing with this patient.* 168 (67.2%) 161 (64.4%) 211 (84.4%) 540 (72.0%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of using a preventive agent with this patient. 44 (17.6%) 57 (22.8%) 56 (22.4%) 157 (20.9%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of getting prophylactic surgery with this patient. 33 (13.2%) 34 (13.6%) 45 (18.0%) 112 (14.9%)
 Refer the patient to a specialist. 143 (57.2%) 139 (55.6%) 126 (50.4%) 408 (54.4%)
Patient 3 is 35 years old and has: No personal history of breast cancer; No personal history of DCIS; No personal history of LCIS; Two first-degree relatives with breast cancer; and was found to carry a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation.
 Continue routine care.* 71 (28.4%) 71 (28.4%) 45 (18.0%) 187 (24.9%)
 Order a screening mammogram for this patient. 148 (59.2%) 158 (63.2%) 165 (66.0%) 471 (62.8%)
 Talk with the patient about her lifestyle behaviors. 117 (46.8%) 122 (48.8%) 114 (45.6%) 353 (47.1%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of using a preventive agent with this patient.* 73 (29.2%) 102 (40.8%) 132 (52.8%) 307 (40.9%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of getting prophylactic surgery with this patient.* 112 (44.8%) 122 (48.8%) 169 (67.2%) 402 (53.6%)
 Refer the patient to a specialist. 207 (82.8%) 203 (81.2%) 205 (82.0%) 615 (82.0%)
Patient 4 is 65 years old and has: No personal history of breast cancer; No personal history of DCIS; No personal history of LCIS; No first-degree relatives with breast cancer; and one breast biopsy showing atypical hyperplasia.
 Continue routine care.* 127 (50.8%) 113 (45.2%) 85 (34.0%) 325 (43.3%)
 Order a screening mammogram for this patient. 181 (72.4%) 170 (68.0%) 161 (64.4%) 512 (68.3%)
 Talk with the patient about her lifestyle behaviors. 105 (42.0%) 109 (43.6%) 110 (44.0%) 324 (43.2%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of getting genetic testing with this patient. 36 (14.4%) 46 (18.4%) 40 (16.0%) 122 (16.3%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of using a preventive agent with this patient.* 36 (14.4%) 50 (20.0%) 69 (27.6%) 155 (20.7%)
 Discuss the pros and cons of getting prophylactic surgery with this patient. 21 (8.4%) 34 (13.6%) 31 (12.4%) 86 (11.5%)
 Refer the patient to a specialist.* 105 (42.0%) 121 (48.4%) 142 (56.8%) 368 (49.1%)

Responses are not mutually exclusive; respondents could select one or more course of action.

*

Indicates significant difference between provider types (p≤ 0.05)

Grey shading indicates the clinically recommended courses of action.