Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2020 Oct 6;52(9):1698–1709. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003463

Table 1.

Summary of previous studies that have examined effects of age on psychotic symptom severity. The table is broken down into A) studies that examine participants across the phase of illness, B) studies that focus on first episode psychosis, C) studies of help-seeking adolescents, and D) population sample studies. Other than Pencer et al. (2005), all studies are cross-sectional in nature. All studies of participants with diagnosed with a psychotic disorder include individuals who are currently or previously have been prescribed antipsychotic medication.

Author and year Sample size (N) Age range or mean & type of analysis (group vs. continuous) Dependent variables examined Results
A. Studies of psychotic disorder across multiple phases of the illness
Mueser et al., (1990) 117 Age range: 20–58 yrs;
Group: those who endorsed hallucinations vs. those who did not
Responses to auditory, tactile, visual, and olfactory/gustatory hallucination items on SCID-DSM III (Spitzer & Williams, 1985) Those who endorsed auditory hallucinations had an earlier age of hospitalization vs. those who did not endorse auditory hallucinations.
Haas & Sweeney, (1992) 71 18–55 yrs;
Continuous
Total symptom scores from SAPS and SANS (Andreasen 1984a, 1984b) No significant effects of age on total positive or negative symptom severity.
Sharma et al., (1999) 160 Age range not reported.
Mean age: 32.3 yrs +/−8 yrs;
Continuous
Hallucinations item score from BPRS (Overall 1962) No significant effect of age or age of onset on hallucination severity.
B. Studies of first episode psychosis
Hafner et al., (1992) 276 12–59 yrs;
Group: 12–24 yrs (N=90) vs. 25–34 yrs (N=110) vs. 35–59 yrs (N=76)
Individual positive and negative symptom items measured via a semi-structured interview (Hafner et al., 1992) Increased delusions of reference in 35–39 yrs vs. 12–24 yrs.
Increased delusions of persecution in 25–34 yrs vs. 12–24 yrs.
Ballageer et al., (2005) 201 15–30 yrs;
Group: 15–18 yrs (N=82) vs. 19–30 yrs (N=119)
Individual item scores from SAPS and SANS (Andreasen 1984a, 1984b) Increased affective flattening in the younger (15–18 yrs) vs. older group (19–30 yrs). No significant differences between groups for all other measures.
Pencer et al., (2005) 138
(1–3 visits)
Group: Adolescents: 15–19 yrs (N=69) Adults: 26–50 yrs (N=69) Total Positive and Negative symptom scores from the PANSS (Kay et al., 1987) No significant effect of group at baseline, or 1- or 2-yr follow-up. Younger people showed more prominent negative symptoms at baseline.
White et al., (2006) 188 Group: 12–19 yrs (N=49) vs. 20–39 yrs (N=139) Total score for SAPS (Andreasen 1984a, 1984b) No significant differences in total positive and negative symptom scores between age groups.
Joa et al., (2009) 232 Age range: 15–65 yrs; Group: ≤18 yrs (N=43) vs. >18 yrs (N=189) Total Positive and Negative symptom scores from the PANSS (Kay et al., 1987) No significant differences in total positive and negative symptom scores between age groups.
C. Studies of help-seeking adolescents
Brandizzi et al., (2014) 171 Age range: 11–18 yrs;
Group: 11–12 yrs (N=30), 13–14 yrs (N=52), 15–16 yrs (N=49), 17–18 years (N=40)
Four factor scores from positive scale of the Prodromal Questionnaire (Loewy 2005): Conceptual Disorganization and Suspiciousness, Perceptual Abnormalities, Bizarre Experiences, and Magical Ideation Increased perceptual positive symptoms in 11–12 yrs vs. 17–18 yrs
Increased non-perceptual positive symptoms (bizarre experiences) in 17–18 yrs vs. 15–16 yrs
Schultze-Lutter et al., (2017) 133 Age range: 8–40 yrs;
Group: 8–12 yrs (N=12), 13–15 yrs (N=30), 16–17 yrs (N=33), 18–19 yrs (N=15), 20–24 yrs (N=30) 25–40 yrs (N=13)
Perceptual (P4) and non-perceptual abnormality scores (P1+P2+P3+P5) from SIPS (McGlashan 2002) Increased subthreshold perceptual positive symptoms
in 8–12 yrs. vs. all other age groups. No significant differences between groups for non-perceptual sub-threshold positive symptoms.
DeVylder et al., (2013) 65 Age range: 12–30 yrs; Continuous Ratings from Positive and Negative symptom items from SIPS (McGlashan, 2002) No significant effects of age for positive or negative symptom scores.
D. Population sample studies
Kelleher et al., (2012b) Studies 1 & 2 = 2243 Studies 3 & 4 = 329 Age range: 11–16 yrs;
Studies 1 & 2: Continuous;
Studies 3 & 4: Group: 11–12 yrs (N=212), 13–15 yrs (N=117)
Studies 1 & 2: Auditory hallucination item from Adolescent Psychotic Symptom Screener (Kelleher 2011)
Studies 3 & 4: Responses to K-SADS-PL psychosis questions (Kaufman et al. 1996)
Studies 1 & 2: Decreased auditory hallucination endorsement with increasing age.
Studies 3 & 4: 22.6% of 11–12 yrs endorsed psychotic symptoms vs. 7% of 13–15 yrs.
Schimmelmann et al., (2015) 689 Age range: 8–40 yrs;
Group: 8–12 yrs (N=45), 13–15 yrs (N=31), 16–17 yrs (N=78), 18–19 yrs (N=81), 20–24 yrs (N=155), 25–29 yrs (N=144), 30–40 yrs (N=155)
Perceptual (P4) and non-perceptual abnormality scores (P1+P2+P3+P5) from SIPS (McGlashan 2002) Increased perceptual positive symptom experiences
in 8–12 yrs and 13–15 yrs vs. all other age groups. No significant differences between groups for non-perceptual positive experiences.

Abbreviations: yrs.: years; SCID-DSMII= Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-III; SAPS=Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms; SANS=Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms; BPRS=Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; PANSS=Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; SIPS=Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes; P1=unusual thoughts rating on SIPS; P2=suspiciousness rating on SIPS; P3=grandiosity rating on SIPS; P4=perceptual abnormality rating on SIPS; P5=disorganized communication on SIPS; KSADS-PL=Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Present and Lifetime version.