Table 2.
Classification system | Classification objectives | Number of items | Patient domain items |
Care team domain items | Social domain items | Environmental domain items | Assessment tools used (individual items are described under their specific domain) | Grading | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History and function | Symptoms | ||||||||
HexCom | To distinguish between those with specialist PC needs | 18 Items | Severity physical symptoms Emotional state Risk factors of psychological vulnerability Feeling loved Confident facing unknown Coherency of being |
Desire for hastened death Resource limitations Managing basic care needs Communication |
Family support External support networks Risk for bereavement Emotional state of family |
Access to care Financial resources planning for death Ability to manage death in care environment |
Three levels – High/Medium/Low complexity. High or medium complexity require community team intervention |
||
Perocca scale | To evaluate the complexity of care provision | 13 Items | Mobility Limb movement Feeding Self-care Elimination |
Wound or skin issues Altered conscious state |
Frequency of observations Education needs Intravenous therapy Communication difficulties Behavioural issues Requiring oxygen |
Four levels of complexity – minimal, intermediate, semi-intensive, intensive | |||
AN-SNAP palliative care | To classify casemix in accordance with health resource use | 9 Items total | Phase of illness Mobility Toileting Eating Transfers |
Pain Other Sx Psychospiritual Sx |
Family or carer distress | RUG-ADL PC Problem severity score (PCPSS) |
11 Classification for inpatient, 22 for community | ||
Hui major criteria | To determine need for specialist versus general palliative care | 11 Items | Poor prognosis Progressive disease despite chemotherapy Brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease Spinal cord compression or cauda equina |
Delirium Spiritual or emotional crisis Severe physical Sx Severe emotional Sx |
Request for specialist PC Request for hastened death Assistance with decision-making and planning |
Two levels – complex (requiring specialist PC) or non-complex (general PC) | |||
IDC-Pal | To diagnose and stratify complexity, and recommends need for specialist PC | 36 Items (35 patient items and one item to add up total score) | Paediatric patient Addiction issues Previous disability Mental illness Patient is a health professional Significant social role Abrupt change in functional autonomy |
Difficult Sx Refractory Sx, Urgent terminal Sx Difficult to control terminal Sx Progressive clinical situation Decompensated organ failure Severe cognitive Sx Severe constitutional Sx Difficult to Mx comorbidity Suicide risk Inadequate emotional coping Spiritual suffering |
Communication conflicts with health care team Request for hastened death Limitations in professional competence Difficulty in coordination of services Non-compliance issues Difficult palliative sedation Difficult medication Mx Difficult interventions |
Family communication conflict Family or carer burden Complex bereavement Inadequate family support Lack of carer competence Dysfunctional family |
Environmental limitations Difficulty accessing material or techniques |
Three levels – Non-complex – no need for specialist PC. – Complex – potential role for spec PC – High complex – spec PC recommended |
|
PALCOM 1 | To assess complexity in palliative care, to manage referral to specialised PC services | 24 Items | Karnofsky performance status | Mechanism of pain Pain characteristics Previous narcotic use Cognitive function Psychological distress Presence of pain Asthenia Anorexia Nausea & Vomiting Constipation Dyspnoea Somnolence Insomnia Anxiety Depression |
Conflict of information Discrepancies regarding proportionality of treatment Loss of desire to remain alive or hasten death Wish for euthanasia |
Absence of carer Carer limitations due to physical health Carer limitations due to work obligations Another person in family requiring care Carer overload Conflict within family |
Karnofsky Performance scale Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP) |
Three levels – Low Complexity, for general PC – Medium Complexity, for specialised PC – High complexity. for specialised PC |
PC: Tool – palliative care; Sx: Symptoms; Mx: Management.