Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;35(4):636–650. doi: 10.1177/0269216321996983

Table 2.

Summary of the classification systems.

Classification system Classification objectives Number of items Patient domain items
Care team domain items Social domain items Environmental domain items Assessment tools used (individual items are described under their specific domain) Grading
History and function Symptoms
HexCom To distinguish between those with specialist PC needs 18 Items Severity physical symptoms
Emotional state
Risk factors of psychological vulnerability
Feeling loved
Confident facing unknown
Coherency of being
Desire for hastened death
Resource limitations
Managing basic care needs
Communication
Family support
External support networks
Risk for bereavement
Emotional state of family
Access to care
Financial resources
planning for death
Ability to manage death in care environment
Three levels – High/Medium/Low complexity.
High or medium complexity require community team intervention
Perocca scale To evaluate the complexity of care provision 13 Items Mobility
Limb movement
Feeding
Self-care
Elimination
Wound or skin issues
Altered conscious state
Frequency of observations
Education needs
Intravenous therapy
Communication difficulties
Behavioural issues
Requiring oxygen
Four levels of complexity – minimal, intermediate, semi-intensive, intensive
AN-SNAP palliative care To classify casemix in accordance with health resource use 9 Items total Phase of illness
Mobility
Toileting
Eating
Transfers
Pain
Other Sx
Psychospiritual Sx
Family or carer distress RUG-ADL
PC Problem severity score (PCPSS)
11 Classification for inpatient, 22 for community
Hui major criteria To determine need for specialist versus general palliative care 11 Items Poor prognosis
Progressive disease despite chemotherapy
Brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease
Spinal cord compression or cauda equina
Delirium
Spiritual or emotional crisis
Severe physical Sx
Severe emotional Sx
Request for specialist PC
Request for hastened death
Assistance with decision-making and planning
Two levels – complex (requiring specialist PC) or non-complex (general PC)
IDC-Pal To diagnose and stratify complexity, and recommends need for specialist PC 36 Items (35 patient items and one item to add up total score) Paediatric patient
Addiction issues
Previous disability
Mental illness
Patient is a health professional
Significant social role
Abrupt change in functional autonomy
Difficult Sx
Refractory Sx,
Urgent terminal Sx
Difficult to control terminal Sx
Progressive clinical situation
Decompensated organ failure
Severe cognitive Sx
Severe constitutional Sx
Difficult to Mx comorbidity
Suicide risk
Inadequate emotional coping
Spiritual suffering
Communication conflicts with health care team
Request for hastened death
Limitations in professional competence
Difficulty in coordination of services
Non-compliance issues
Difficult palliative sedation
Difficult medication Mx
Difficult interventions
Family communication conflict
Family or carer burden
Complex bereavement
Inadequate family support
Lack of carer competence
Dysfunctional family
Environmental limitations
Difficulty accessing material or techniques
Three levels
– Non-complex – no need for specialist PC.
– Complex – potential role for spec PC
– High complex – spec PC recommended
PALCOM 1 To assess complexity in palliative care, to manage referral to specialised PC services 24 Items Karnofsky performance status Mechanism of pain
Pain characteristics
Previous narcotic use
Cognitive function
Psychological distress
Presence of pain
Asthenia
Anorexia
Nausea & Vomiting
Constipation
Dyspnoea
Somnolence
Insomnia
Anxiety
Depression
Conflict of information
Discrepancies regarding proportionality of treatment
Loss of desire to remain alive or hasten death
Wish for euthanasia
Absence of carer
Carer limitations due to physical health
Carer limitations due to work obligations
Another person in family requiring care
Carer overload
Conflict within family
Karnofsky Performance scale
Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP)
Three levels
– Low Complexity, for general PC
– Medium Complexity, for specialised PC
– High complexity. for specialised PC

PC: Tool – palliative care; Sx: Symptoms; Mx: Management.