Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;39(11):4258–4275. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24244

Table 2.

Temporal sorting analysis—main effects for the 4 (condition) × 4 (run) repeated measures ANOVAs

Component 4 (condition) × 4 (run) ANOVA ANOVA main effect statistic Pairwise comparisons/simple main effects p value
Left CEN Main effect of run F(3, 39) = 4.90, p = .006 Run 4 > run 1 <.005
Run 3 > run 1 <.05
Main effect of condition ns
Right CEN Main effect of run

ns

Main effect of condition *F(1.36, 17.68) = 6.36, p < .01 Regulate > rest <.05
View > rest <.05
Neutral > rest <.001
DMN Main effect of run F(3, 39) = 3.10, p = .039 Run 1 < run 2 <.05
Run 1 < run 3 <.05
Run 1 < run 4 <.05
Main effect of condition *F(1.74, 22.54) = 3.69, p < .05 View > rest <.05
View > neutral <.005
SN Main effect of run ns
Main effect of condition F(3, 39) = 6.91, p = .001 Regulate > rest <.005
View > rest <.05

Main effect and follow‐up comparison results for the 4 Condition × 4 Run repeated measures ANOVA. Runs 1–3 consist of amygdala downregulation neurofeedback training runs, and run 4 is the transfer run without neurofeedback. Asterisks indicate ANOVAS where assumptions of sphericity were violated and a Huynh–Feldt correction was applied. CEN = central executive network; DMN = default mode network; SN = salience network.