Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;39(11):4258–4275. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24244

Table 3.

Temporal sorting analysis—interactions and simple main effects for the 4 (condition) × 4 (run) repeated measures ANOVAs

Component analysis 4 (condition) × 4 (run) ANOVA interaction statistic Simple main effect Pairwise comparison p value
Left CEN F(5.11, 66.64) = 2.81, p < .05* Conditions Rest Run 1 < run 4 <.01
Run 1 < run 3 <.01
Regulate Run 1 < run 4 <.01
View ns
Neutral ns
Runs Run 1 Regulate < view <.05
View > rest <.005
Neutral > rest <.005
Run2 ns
Run 3 ns
Run 4 ns
Right CEN F(4.20, 54.63) = 2.84, p < .05* Condition Rest ns
Regulate Run 2 > run 4 <.01
Run 3 > run 4 <.05
View Run 1 > run 4 <.05
Neutral Run 1 > run 3 <.05
Run 1 > run 4 <.001
Run 2 > run 4 <.05
Run 3 > run 4 <.05
Runs Run 1 Regulate > rest <.05
View > rest <.005
Neutral > rest <.005
Run 2 ns
Run 3 ns
Run 4 ns
DMN F(5.43, 70.60) = 3.97, p = .002 Conditions Rest Run 1 < run 2 <.01
Run 1 < run 3 <.01
Run 1 < run 4 <.01
Regulate ns
View ns
Neutral ns
Runs Run 1 Rest < regulate <.005
Rest < view <.005
Rest < neutral <.005
View > neutral <.05
Run 2 ns
Run 3 ns
Run 4 ns
SN ns

Interaction and follow‐up comparison results for the 4 Condition × 4 Run repeated measures ANOVA. Runs 1–3 consist of amygdala downregulation neurofeedback training runs, and run 4 is the transfer run without neurofeedback. Asterisks indicate ANOVAS where assumptions of sphericity were violated and a Huynh–Feldt correction was applied. CEN = central executive network; DMN = default mode network; SN = salience network.