Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2020 Sep 1;13(12):2190–2201. doi: 10.1002/aur.2373

Table 5.

Linear model parameter estimates for dyadic synchrony and responsiveness by risk status

Dyadic Synchrony
Infant Responsiveness
Maternal Responsiveness
Fixed Effects Estimate (SE) t Estimate (SE) t Estimate (SE) t
Risk Groupa 5.77(10.5) 0.55 4.51(4.0) 1.13 −3.02(5.4) −0.56
Visit 4.64(0.8) 5.61** 1.66(0.3) 5.31** 1.92(0.4) 4.57**
Group x Visit −1.22(1.1) −1.11 −0.72(0.4) −1.73 0.03(0.6) 0.06
Infant Sexb 3.25(2.7) 1.19 1.38(1.0) 1.34 2.74(1.5) 1.86
Maternal Education (yrs) 0.79(0.6) 1.34 0.36(0.2) 1.61 0.18(0.3) 0.57
Estimated Marginal Meansc
Group x 6M Visit 2.06(5.1) 0.41 0.10(1.9) 0.05 3.40(2.6) 1.29
Group x 9M Visit 4.42(4.3) 1.02 1.51(1.6) 0.92 1.83(2.3) 0.81
Group x 12M Visit 9.26(4.4) 2.11* 4.39(1.7) 2.64* 3.11(2.3) 1.36

Note:

a

Dichotomized as High-risk = 1; Low-risk = 0.

b

Dichotomized as Male = 1; Female = 0.

c

Separate models were specified for marginal means treating visit as a categorical variable to identify when age differences emerged.

*

p values < .05

**

p values < .001