Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2020 Sep 1;13(12):2190–2201. doi: 10.1002/aur.2373

Table 6.

Linear model parameter estimates for dyadic synchrony and responsiveness by outcome

Dyadic Synchrony
Infant Responsiveness
Maternal Responsiveness
Fixed Effects Estimate (SE) t Estimate (SE) t Estimate (SE) t
Outcome Groupa −9.24(8.4) −1.10 −6.51(3.1) −2.08* −1.35(4.3) −0.31
Visit 0.50(2.4) 0.21 −0.92(0.9) −1.03 1.10(1.2) 0.90
Group x Visit 1.18(0.9) 1.34 0.78(0.3) 2.38* 0.26(0.5) 0.59
Infant Sexb 3.48(3.0) 1.17 1.62(1.1) 1.49 2.87(1.6) 1.74
Maternal Education (yrs) 1.13(0.6) 1.77 0.60(0.2) 2.58* 0.20(0.4) 0.56
Estimated Marginal Meansc
Group x 6M Visit
ASD x Non-TD 2.51(4.0) 0.63
ASD x TD 2.43(3.2) 0.77
Non-TD x TD −0.08(2.9) −0.03
Group x 9M Visit
ASD x Non-TD 4.75(3.5) 1.36
ASD x TD 2.43(2.7) 0.91
Non-TD x TD −2.32(2.7) −0.87
Group x 12M Visit
ASD x Non-TD 1.83(3.6) 0.51
ASD x TD −5.14(2.8) −1.81
Non-TD x TD −6.97(2.6) −2.71*

Note:

a

Coded as ASD = 1; Non-TD = 2; TD = 3.

b

Dichotomized as Male = 1; Female = 0.

c

Separate models were specified for marginal means treating visit as a categorical variable to identify when differences emerged.

*

p values < .05