Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2018 Sep 1;99(9):1791–1812. doi: 10.1175/bams-d-16-0244.1

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12.

Comparison of solar radiation divergence model estimates with different levels of complexity (models 1–5) vs the below-vine-canopy solar radiation measurements (15-min averages). Error histograms for all the models indicate that the least bias and smallest error with the observations are from using models 3 and 5. Scatterplots for models 3 and 5 are provided with a dashed gray line indicating perfect agreement with observations (1:1 line).