Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan 13;18(10):2179–2191.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.008

Table 3.

Comparative efficacy of pharmacological agents for induction of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis with prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, using network meta-analysis. Comparisons should be read from left to right. Odds ratio for comparisons are in the cell in common between the column-defining and row-defining treatment. Bold numbers with darker background are statistically significant. For induction of clinical remission, odds ratio >1 favors row-defining treatment. For induction of endoscopic improvement, odds ratio >1 favors column-defining treatment. Numbers in parentheses indicate 95% confidence interval.

Induction of CLINICAL REMISSION
Induction of ENDOSCOPIC IMPROVEMENT Ustekinumab 6mg/kg 0.97 (0.11-8.72) 5.99 (1.13-31.76) 10.71 (2.01-57.20) 11.51 (2.65-49.96)
0.77 (0.28-2.18) Tofacitinib 10mg b.d. 6.18 (1.00-38.00) 11.05 (1.79-68.41) 11.88 (2.32-60.89)
2.98 (1.20-7.41) 3.85 (1.51-9.80) Vedolizumab 1.79 (0.86-3.70) 1.92 (0.87-4.25)
3.32 (1.29-8.58) 4.29 (1.63-11.33) 1.12 (0.48-2.59) Adalimumab 1.07 (0.48-2.41)
3.64 (1.78-7.46) 4.71 (2.23-9.92) 1.22 (0.70-2.15) 1.10 (0.59-2.04) Placebo