Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;11(2):jkaa056. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa056

Table 4.

Effect of sample size on simulation results for P-value thresholds

Trait Threshold (P-value) n = 8,816
n = 19,840
n = 133,653 or 123,865
Positives
eFDRb Δ sig. loci (% True positive) Positives
eFDR Δ sig. loci
(% True
positive)
Positives
eFDR Δ sig. loci (% True
positive)
False Truea False True False True
Height 5 × 10-8 0.04 0.90 4.3% 0.03 11 0.27% 1.6 181 0.89%
5 × 10−7 0.40 2.2 15% +1.7 (78%) 0.32 18 1.7% +7.4 (96%) 4.9 223 2.2% +46 (93%)
5 × 10−6 3.0 5.9 34% +6.3 (58%) 3.6 30 11% +15 (79%) 16 283 5.4% +72 (84%)
BMI 5 × 10−8 0.04 0.20 17% 0.09 1.5 5.7% 0.62 39 1.6%
5 × 10−7 0.34 0.41 45% +0.51 (41%) 0.46 2.4 16% +1.3 (72%) 2.7 58 4.4% +22 (90%)
5 × 10−6 3.1 1.2 73% +3.5 (21%) 3.2 4.6 41% +5.0 (44%) 11 90 11% +41 (79%)
a

Number of loci in truth set for HDL: 89, LDL: 72, TG: 60, height: 1100, BMI: 724.

b

eFDR is calculated as number of false positives divided by sum of true and false positives.