Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Colorectal Dis. 2021 Feb 10;23(2):451–460. doi: 10.1111/codi.15515

Table 1.

Similarities and differences between MSK-BFI and LARS score

Attribute MSK-BFI LARS-Q
Target population Rectal Cancer Patients with Sphincter Preserving Surgery
Purpose Bowel Function Assessment
Mode of administration Self-Completed Self-Completed
Number of questions 18 5
Dimensions of bowel function Adopts a 4-week recall period No specific recall period
  Frequency 6 items (Q1, Q5, Q8, Q9, Q10, Q11) 1 item (Q3)
  Urgency/soilage 4 items (Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18) 2 items (Q2, Q5)
  Diet 4 items (Q2, Q3, Q13, Q14) No items
Other
  Incomplete evacuation 1 item (Q4) No items
  Continence of gas 1 item (Q12) 1 item (Q1)
  Discrimination of gas vs stool 1 item (Q7) No items
Empty bowels within last 15 m 1 item (Q6) 1 item (Q4)
Summary scores(s) Total score: sum of global score + independent items
Global score: sum of the 3 sub-scales
3 sub-scales
Total score
Item response scales Integers from 1 to 5.
Five categories for each question (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, always).
Integers from 0 to 16.
Different scoring for each question.
Between 3 to 4 categories for item.
Scoring Unweighted sum for each item, by sub-scale, global scale, and total scale.
Range: 17–90; higher score = better bowel function.
Corresponds to a continuous score, so far no clinical categories have been used.
Weighted scoring. Final score is the sum for each individual item.
Range: 0–42; lower score = better bowel function.
Results discriminate 3 categories:
0–20 = No LARS, 21–29 = Minor LARS, 30–42 = Major LARS

Abbreviations: MSK-BFI, Memorial Sloan Kettering Bowel Function Instrument; LARS, low anterior resection syndrome.