Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 6;35(5):1963–1969. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08470-6

Table 1.

Survey Results from the Hands-on Session

1–Not at All %, (n) 2 %, (n) 3–Neutral %, (n) 4 %, (n) 5–Definitely %, (n) Total (n)
At the beginning of the hands-on session, my instructor reviewed the educational plan for the session

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

92.9%

(13)

14
The manner of instruction during the hands-on session was well-structured

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

92.9%

(13)

14
I was allowed adequate time to ask questions during the training

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

100%

(14)

14
My instructor was comfortable in silence when the task was going well

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

92.9%

(13)

14
I achieved my personal learning objectives during the hands-on session

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

14.3%

(2)

85.7%

(12)

14
The style of instruction was helpful in achieving my objectives

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

100%

(14)

14
My instructor provided feedback on my performance

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

0%

(0)

92.9%

(13)

14
My instructor asked me to provide feedback on my performance

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

7.1%

(1)

85.7%

(12)

14
I found the porcine model to be valuable to the learning experience

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

28.6%

(4)

71.4%

(3)

14
I found the Proximie telementoring platform to be valuable to the learning experience

7.1%

(1)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

85.7%

(12)

14
I left the course with a clear take-home message

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

92.9%

(13)

14
The virtual format was conducive to achieving my personal learning objectives

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

7.1%

(1)

92.9%

(13)

14
The session was relevant to my professional development as a surgeon

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

0%

(0)

100%

(14)

14