Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 11;61(3):1193–1203. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01216

Table 8. Relative Binding Free Energies From the LIE Method and the Combined OSP + TPF Results in Comparison Against Experimental Findingsa.

mut at 105 P1’ = Ile
P1’ = Pro
mut LIE OSP + TPF exp LIE OSP + TPF exp
Arg 1.4 –2.5 –18.5 –14.7  
Asn –12.3 –14.1 –20.4 –16.7  
Asp 34.0 1.1   –47.1 6.9  
Cys 5.1 –13.8 –11.8 –12.2  
Gln –8.9 –5.5 –30.9 11.8  
Glu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  
His –1.2 –15.6 –23.2 –2.4  
Lys –20.6 –11.4   –11.0 16.1  
Met –0.9 –6.2 –24.8 –12.3
Phe –6.9 1.5   –29.7 5.3  
Ser –10.5 –22.2 –22.9 12.9  
Thr –10.2 –11.9 –19.0 11.5  
Trp –15.8 –79.5 –30.5 –18.2  
Tyr 2.8 –9.4 –20.3 9.0  
MAD   13.3     22.0  
R   0.41     –0.06  
at 171 P1′ = Ile P1′ = Pro
mut LIE OSP + TPF exp LIE OSP + TPF exp
Arg 4.8 –4.1 –2.2 4.9
Asn –0.1 –0.8   –4.4 –1.8
Asp 4.2 –10.3   –0.5 –3.9
Cys 8.8 5.4 7.1 0.7
Gln –0.2 –8.4   2.4 –2.1
Glu –0.3 –9.9 –0.1 –8.2
His 0.4 2.2   3.8 3.2  
Lys –4.1 –4.5 –2.8 5.3  
Met 1.6 0.8   –14.2 8.3  
Phe –0.1 3.0   4.2 6.7  
Ser 3.4 –3.7 –2.1 6.3  
Thr –6.7 –6.6   4.6 0.2  
Trp –1.8 –1.2 0.8 3.8  
Tyr –0.2 16.8   1.6 –0.3  
MAD   5.5     6.0  
R   0.15     –0.31  
a

All free energies are reported in kJ/mol for both mutation sites and both P1′ amino acids. MAD: mean average deviation between LIE and OSP + TPF approach; r: Pearson correlation coefficient between LIE and OSP + TPF approach.